Abstract:Trihydroxamate siderophores have been proposed for use as mediators of actinide and heavy metal mobility in contaminated subsurface zones. These microbially produced ligands, common in terrestrial and marine environments, recently have been derivatized synthetically to enhance their affinity for transuranic metal cations. However, the interactions between these synthetic derivative and adsorbed trace metals have not been characterized. In this paper we compare a natural siderophore, desferrioxamine-B (DFO-B), … Show more
“…Adsorption of the metallophore is considered a prerequisite in the process of ligand-controlled dissolution (Stumm 1997), and several studies have shown metallophore-promoted dissolution rates to be proportional to the concentration of the ligand adsorbed on the mineral surface (Cheah et al 2003;Duckworth et al 2014;Duckworth and Sposito 2005a;Reichard et al 2005). However, adsorption retains metallophores and metal-metallophore complexes at the surfaces of environmental reactive compounds, thereby reducing the diffusive flux of the target metal toward the organism (Duckworth et al 2008;Haack et al 2008;Kraemer et al 2002;Siebner-Freibach et al 2004. The extent to which metallophores are retained depends on how strongly the ligands and complexes interact with environmental reactive compounds and on the abundance of reactive surfaces.…”
Section: Metallophores and The Geochemistry Of Metal Bioavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, metallophores may affect the fate and transport of metals that are not necessarily the target of biological uptake. Metallophores have been shown to bind (Anderegg et al 1963;Batka and Farkas 2006;Boukhalfa et al 2007;Christenson and Schijf 2011;Dahlheimer et al 2007;Farkas et al 2008;Frazier et al 2005;Hakemian et al 2005;Hernlem et al 1996Hernlem et al , 1999Jarvis and Hancock 1991;Mishra et al 2009;Moll et al 2008a, b, c;Whisenhunt et al 1996) and solubilize (Biver and Shotyk 2012;Brainard et al 1992;Cornejo-Garrido et al 2008;Dahlheimer et al 2007;Frazier et al 2005;Hakemian et al 2005;Hepinstall et al 2005;Kraemer et al 1999Kraemer et al , 2002Manecki and Maurice 2008;Mishra et al 2010;Schenkeveld et al 2014b; Wolff-Boenisch and Traina 2007b) a number of metals (e.g., Al, Am, Bi, Cm, In, Ru, Pb, Pd, Pt, Pu, Sb, Th, U, and a number of rare earth elements) which are not currently thought to have significant intracellular metabolic roles in most organisms and may even be toxic. These observations have led to the assertion that metallophores may affect the rate of dissolution and transport of these toxic metals in the environment, as well as to the suggestion that metallophores may have utility as remediative agents in environmental systems contaminated with toxic metals.…”
Section: Metallophores and Contaminant Metals: Mobilization Uptake mentioning
Trace metal limitation not only affects the biological function of organisms, but also the health of ecosystems and the global cycling of elements. The enzymatic machinery of microbes helps to drive critical biogeochemical cycles at the macroscale, and in many cases, the function of metalloenzyme-mediated processes may be limited by the scarcity of essential trace metals. In response to these nutrient limitations, some organisms employ a strategy of exuding metallophores, biogenic ligands that facilitate the uptake of metal ions. For example, bacterial, fungal, and graminaceous plant species are known to use Fe(III)-binding siderophores for nutrient acquisition, providing the best known and most thoroughly studied example of metallophores. However, recent breakthroughs have suggested or established the role of metallophores in the uptake of several other metallic nutrients. Furthermore, these metallophores may influence environmental trace metal fate and transport beyond nutrient acquisition. These discoveries have resulted in a deeper understanding of trace metal geochemistry and its relationship to the cycling of carbon and nitrogen in natural systems. In this review, we provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the biogeochemistry of metallophores in trace metal acquisition, and explore established and potential metallophore systems.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (
“…Adsorption of the metallophore is considered a prerequisite in the process of ligand-controlled dissolution (Stumm 1997), and several studies have shown metallophore-promoted dissolution rates to be proportional to the concentration of the ligand adsorbed on the mineral surface (Cheah et al 2003;Duckworth et al 2014;Duckworth and Sposito 2005a;Reichard et al 2005). However, adsorption retains metallophores and metal-metallophore complexes at the surfaces of environmental reactive compounds, thereby reducing the diffusive flux of the target metal toward the organism (Duckworth et al 2008;Haack et al 2008;Kraemer et al 2002;Siebner-Freibach et al 2004. The extent to which metallophores are retained depends on how strongly the ligands and complexes interact with environmental reactive compounds and on the abundance of reactive surfaces.…”
Section: Metallophores and The Geochemistry Of Metal Bioavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, metallophores may affect the fate and transport of metals that are not necessarily the target of biological uptake. Metallophores have been shown to bind (Anderegg et al 1963;Batka and Farkas 2006;Boukhalfa et al 2007;Christenson and Schijf 2011;Dahlheimer et al 2007;Farkas et al 2008;Frazier et al 2005;Hakemian et al 2005;Hernlem et al 1996Hernlem et al , 1999Jarvis and Hancock 1991;Mishra et al 2009;Moll et al 2008a, b, c;Whisenhunt et al 1996) and solubilize (Biver and Shotyk 2012;Brainard et al 1992;Cornejo-Garrido et al 2008;Dahlheimer et al 2007;Frazier et al 2005;Hakemian et al 2005;Hepinstall et al 2005;Kraemer et al 1999Kraemer et al , 2002Manecki and Maurice 2008;Mishra et al 2010;Schenkeveld et al 2014b; Wolff-Boenisch and Traina 2007b) a number of metals (e.g., Al, Am, Bi, Cm, In, Ru, Pb, Pd, Pt, Pu, Sb, Th, U, and a number of rare earth elements) which are not currently thought to have significant intracellular metabolic roles in most organisms and may even be toxic. These observations have led to the assertion that metallophores may affect the rate of dissolution and transport of these toxic metals in the environment, as well as to the suggestion that metallophores may have utility as remediative agents in environmental systems contaminated with toxic metals.…”
Section: Metallophores and Contaminant Metals: Mobilization Uptake mentioning
Trace metal limitation not only affects the biological function of organisms, but also the health of ecosystems and the global cycling of elements. The enzymatic machinery of microbes helps to drive critical biogeochemical cycles at the macroscale, and in many cases, the function of metalloenzyme-mediated processes may be limited by the scarcity of essential trace metals. In response to these nutrient limitations, some organisms employ a strategy of exuding metallophores, biogenic ligands that facilitate the uptake of metal ions. For example, bacterial, fungal, and graminaceous plant species are known to use Fe(III)-binding siderophores for nutrient acquisition, providing the best known and most thoroughly studied example of metallophores. However, recent breakthroughs have suggested or established the role of metallophores in the uptake of several other metallic nutrients. Furthermore, these metallophores may influence environmental trace metal fate and transport beyond nutrient acquisition. These discoveries have resulted in a deeper understanding of trace metal geochemistry and its relationship to the cycling of carbon and nitrogen in natural systems. In this review, we provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the biogeochemistry of metallophores in trace metal acquisition, and explore established and potential metallophore systems.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (
“…(Table 1). The maximum surface excess (n max ) for DFOB on manganite [n max = 32 ± 5 mmol kg -1 at pH = 8 (Duckworth and Sposito 2005b)] is significantly higher than on goethite [n max = 1.23 ± 0.18 mmol kg -1 at pH = 5 (Cheah et al 2003)], although sorption of DFOB on goethite may increase at higher pH (Kraemer et al 2002). Given that dissolution rates at corresponding conditions differ by [100-fold (Duckworth and Sposito 2005b), increased surface excess does not adequately explain the rapid dissolution rates of a-MnOOH relative to a-FeOOH.…”
Section: Siderophore-promoted Dissolution Of Mn and Fe Mineralsmentioning
Siderophores, biogenic chelating agents that facilitate Fe(III) uptake through the formation of strong complexes, also form strong complexes with Mn(III) and exhibit high reactivity with Mn (hydr)oxides, suggesting a pathway by which Mn may disrupt Fe uptake. In this review, we evaluate the major biogeochemical mechanisms by which Fe and Mn may interact through reactions with microbial siderophores: competition for a limited pool of siderophores, sorption of siderophores and metal-siderophore complexes to mineral surfaces, and competitive metal-siderophore complex formation through parallel mineral dissolution pathways. This rich interweaving of chemical processes gives rise to an intricate tapestry of interactions, particularly in respect to the biogeochemical cycling of Fe and Mn in marine ecosystems.
“…In recent years, adsorption has been shown to be an effective and economically feasible alternative method for removal of heavy-metal ions. [6][7][8] Nonspecific sorbents such as activated carbon, [9,10] metal oxides, [11,12] silica, [13][14][15] ion-exchange resins, and biosorbents [16] have been used. Specific sorbents have been proposed, consisting of a ligand that can specifically interact with the metal ions, and a carrier matrix that may be an inorganic material (e.g., silica) [14,15,17] or polymers (such as polyA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (styrene), poly(methacrylate), or poly(vinylbutyral)).…”
Fine microparticles of poly(p-phenylenediamine) (PpPD) and poly(m-phenylenediamine) (PmPD) were directly synthesized by a facile oxidative precipitation polymerization and their strong ability to adsorb lead ions from aqueous solution was examined. It was found that the degree of adsorption of the lead ions depends on the pH, concentration, and temperature of the lead ion solution, as well as the contact time and microparticle dose. The adsorption data fit the Langmuir isotherm and the process obeyed pseudo-second-order kinetics. According to the Langmuir equation, the maximum adsorption capacities of lead ions onto PpPD and PmPD microparticles at 30 degrees C are 253.2 and 242.7 mg g(-1), respectively. The highest adsorptivity of lead ions is up to 99.8 %. The adsorption is very rapid with a loading half-time of only 2 min as well as initial adsorption rates of 95.24 and 83.06 mg g(-1) min(-1) on PpPD and PmPD particles, respectively. A series of batch experiment results showed that the PpPD microparticles possess an even stronger capability to adsorb lead ions than the PmPD microparticles, but the PmPD microparticles, with a more-quinoid-like structure, show a stronger dependence of lead-ion adsorption on the pH and temperature of the lead-ion solution. A possible adsorption mechanism through complexation between Pb(2+) ions and ==N-- groups on the macromolecular chains has been proposed. The powerful lead-ion adsorption on the microparticles makes them promising adsorbents for wastewater cleanup.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.