1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1992.tb00551.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Nafamostat Mesilate by Hemodialysis Membranes

Abstract: The adsorption of the anticoagulant nafamostat mesilate (FUT-175) by five different hemodialysis mem-brane\ was studied in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, FUT-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why the adsorption rate of arbekacin onto AN69 was high is likely to be the formation of ionic bonds between the positively charged arbekacin with the negatively charged AN69 membrane. This result is consistent with findings from a previous study on the influence of charge of low molecular weight proteins on adsorption onto hemodialysis membranes [14] and a study showing that positively charged nafamostat mesilate adsorbed onto AN69 membrane [9], which indicates that adsorption onto hemodialysis membranes depends on the charge of adsorbed substances. In our in vitro adsorption experiment using a minimodule, we found that when polysulfone was used, the circulating arbekacin concentration (i.e., the concentration that reflects adsorption) barely changed at all over 240 min and the arbekacin concentration in the ultrafiltrate was the same as the circulating arbekacin concentration, which indicates that arbekacin mostly permeated through polysulfone without being adsorbed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason why the adsorption rate of arbekacin onto AN69 was high is likely to be the formation of ionic bonds between the positively charged arbekacin with the negatively charged AN69 membrane. This result is consistent with findings from a previous study on the influence of charge of low molecular weight proteins on adsorption onto hemodialysis membranes [14] and a study showing that positively charged nafamostat mesilate adsorbed onto AN69 membrane [9], which indicates that adsorption onto hemodialysis membranes depends on the charge of adsorbed substances. In our in vitro adsorption experiment using a minimodule, we found that when polysulfone was used, the circulating arbekacin concentration (i.e., the concentration that reflects adsorption) barely changed at all over 240 min and the arbekacin concentration in the ultrafiltrate was the same as the circulating arbekacin concentration, which indicates that arbekacin mostly permeated through polysulfone without being adsorbed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, it is believed that removal of arbekacin by hemodialysis must be taken into account when determining dosages for patients on hemodialysis [5,6]. Although adsorption onto hemodialysis membranes has been reported as a mechanism of drug removal by dialysis [8][9][10], there have been very few studies Dialysate flow rate (mL/min) 500 500 500…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, the anti-thrombogenicity of the AN69ST membrane exceeds that of the native AN69 membrane and anticoagulant-free hemodialysis using AN69ST membrane has been reported [40,41]. On the other hand, as the sulfonyl groups on the AN69 membrane adsorb nafamostate mesilate, this anticoagulant is not compatible enough with the AN69/ AN69ST membrane [42]. Appropriate priming is most important and unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin is recommended if possible.…”
Section: Pmma Hemofiltermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AN69ST membrane was developed based on the AN69 membrane, which was released in the market in France in 1969. Because the AN69 membrane has a strong negative charge, it poses problems such as induction of bradykinin production [7] and adsorption of pharmacological agents such as NM [8]. Therefore, with the AN69ST membrane, surface treatment has been performed to neutralize the negative charge at the surface of the membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%