2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of methyl orange by porous membranes prepared from deep eutectic supramolecular polymer-modified chitosan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical analysis employed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to investigate the significant different between each treatment on beads immobilization and free cell, which expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD (standard deviation). The difference between mean values at confidence level of 5% (P < 0.05) were considered as statistically significant between group mean [ 1 , 38 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statistical analysis employed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to investigate the significant different between each treatment on beads immobilization and free cell, which expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD (standard deviation). The difference between mean values at confidence level of 5% (P < 0.05) were considered as statistically significant between group mean [ 1 , 38 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyes are materials with several functions and are often used in the textile industry for coloring fabrics and textiles. Various types of dyes have been identified [ 1 ], one of which is classified based on charge, depending on the chemical structure. For example, anionic dyes have a negative charge when dissolved in water, including methyl orange (MO), which is usually used for dyeing textiles such as wool, cotton, and silk fabrics [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sulphonic group is responsible for the high MO solubility in water; in addition, the main drawback of MO is the harm to the environment and human beings [11]. Many strategies have been reported to remove MO from the aquatic environment (e.g., biological treatments [12], oxidation [13], membranes [14], adsorption [15], photocatalytic degradation [16], and coagulation-flocculation [17]). However, despite different options, the traditional methods have some disadvantages that include energy requirements, costs, incomplete removal, and harmful by-products [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChemEngineering 2023, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 18 [14], adsorption [15], photocatalytic degradation [16], and coagulation-flocculation [17]). However, despite different options, the traditional methods have some disadvantages that include energy requirements, costs, incomplete removal, and harmful by-products [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%