2013
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2012.762127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of iodoalkanes on graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that any interaction between iodine atoms is rather weak, in contrast with the strong iodine–iodine interactions that have been observed for iodoalkanes, where iodine atoms on neighboring molecules are positioned closer than the sum of their van der Waals radii. 35 The lack of strong interactions is supported by the DFT calculations, which indicate that the vast majority of the binding energy of the layer is due to dispersion interactions. However, the molecules are oriented so that the σ-hole of one iodine atom would point at the belt of electron density surrounding the circumference of the neighboring iodine atom.…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that any interaction between iodine atoms is rather weak, in contrast with the strong iodine–iodine interactions that have been observed for iodoalkanes, where iodine atoms on neighboring molecules are positioned closer than the sum of their van der Waals radii. 35 The lack of strong interactions is supported by the DFT calculations, which indicate that the vast majority of the binding energy of the layer is due to dispersion interactions. However, the molecules are oriented so that the σ-hole of one iodine atom would point at the belt of electron density surrounding the circumference of the neighboring iodine atom.…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…34 The zigzag arrangement of iodine atoms closely resembles the placement of iodine atoms in iodoalkane overlayers. 35,36 In the flat arrangement, where the iodine atoms approach each other most closely, the I−I separation is 4.36 Å, somewhat larger than the sum of the van der Waals radii, 3.96 Å. This implies that any interaction between iodine atoms is rather weak, in contrast with the strong iodine−iodine interactions that have been observed for iodoalkanes, where iodine atoms on neighboring molecules are positioned closer than the sum of their van der Waals radii.…”
Section: ■ Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressibility ratio of acetic acid in the bulk and surface is significantly different with the 2D layer being approximately 2 orders of magnitude bigger than the bulk. There is evidence that these 2D layers are more susceptible to expanding/contracting relative to 3D crystals partly due to a change in the coordination number. , This is also supported by data reported in the literature, where the pure stearic acid bulk isothermal compressibility coefficient is approximately 7.9 × 10 –5 bar –1 and the 2D compressibility coefficient of stearic acid Langmuir layer at the air–water interface in the condensed phase is 3.0 × 10 5 bar –1 ; the 2D layer is 10 orders of magnitude more compressible. (Details of the compressibility calculation are provided in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that haloperfluorocarbons (X–PFCs) act as good XB donors and are capable of establishing strong XBs with electron-rich molecules, especially pyridine derivatives. , Therefore, the specific N···X–PFC synthons have been commonly utilized in 3D crystal engineering and supramolecular architecture. The formation of 2D XB-based monolayers of X-PFCs and pyridyl species was first reported by Clarke et al, and in their pioneering works, the self-assembled cocrystal physisorbed monolayers involving 4,4′-bipyridine and 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene ( 4F2I ), 1,4-dibromotetrafluorobenzene ( 4F2I ), 1,4-diiodobenzene ( 4H2I ) on graphite were identified via synchrotron X-ray diffraction and DFT calculations. Moreover, they also studied the adsorbed monolayers of several halogenated alkanes and pyridine derivatives on the graphite substrate using differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray and neutral diffraction. Subsequently, Wan and co-workers has demonstrated the formation of an open porous network on HOPG using ethynylpyridine and aryl-halide-based building blocks, and they obtained four main supramolecular assemblies driven by the N···I interactions between terminal pyridyl moieties and iodoperfluorobenzenes . However, to the best of our knowledge, few theoretical studies concerning intermolecular X···N bonds in the binary network of X-PFCs and pyridyl derivatives on graphite surface have been reported to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%