2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of enzymes to stimuli-responsive polymer brushes: Influence of brush conformation on adsorbed amount and biocatalytic activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HNs with plentiful carboxyl groups were considered specifically advisable for this method, as the steric hindrance was no longer dominant in this process. Physical adsorption [44][45][46] could enable the 5-AF to enter the inside of the hairy nanospheres easily, and their positions in the polyelectrolyte could be rearranged. Therefore, a large amount of 5-AF could be embedded in the PAA structure by the electrostatic driving force.…”
Section: Effect Of Coupling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HNs with plentiful carboxyl groups were considered specifically advisable for this method, as the steric hindrance was no longer dominant in this process. Physical adsorption [44][45][46] could enable the 5-AF to enter the inside of the hairy nanospheres easily, and their positions in the polyelectrolyte could be rearranged. Therefore, a large amount of 5-AF could be embedded in the PAA structure by the electrostatic driving force.…”
Section: Effect Of Coupling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the enzyme is adhered to hydrophobic interfaces, the "lid" changes to "open" conformation, enabling the access of the substrate to the active site and enhancing thereby the lipase activity dramatically, up to 50% of the activity of that shown by the native lipase (Palomo et al, 2002). There are many other examples of enzymes immobilized through adsorption on polymeric materials such as laccase (Labus et al, 2012), glucose oxidase (Koenig et al, 2016), carbonic anhydrase (Assarsson et al, 2014), and cellulase (Wang S. et al, 2013). Furthermore, there are interesting biopolymers for adsorbing enzymes, such as chitosan, calcium alginate, cellulose, agarose, or commercially available ion-exchange resins.…”
Section: Physical Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature allows for the easy recovery and reuse of the polymer . Additionally, some polyelectrolyte brushes have been developed using poly(2‐vinylpyridine) and mixtures with methacrylic acid, which change their conformation in response to changes in the pH of the medium . Like thermoresponsive polymers, pH‐responsive polymers also have reversible phase transition properties causing solubility and insolubility as the response to the medium changes .…”
Section: Polymer Supports For Degradation Of Organic Pollutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…110,111 Additionally, some polyelectrolyte brushes have been developed using poly(2-vinylpyridine) and mixtures with methacrylic acid, which change their conformation in response to changes in the pH of the medium. 112 Like thermoresponsive polymers, pH-responsive polymers also have reversible phase transition properties causing solubility and insolubility as the response to the medium changes. 109 In general, the immobilization on these polymers generates good properties in the immobilized enzymes, eliminates diffusional problems, allows their reuse after enzyme deactivation, and preserves a high activity in the enzyme.…”
Section: Crosslinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%