1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of EDTA and Metal–EDTA Complexes onto Goethite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
176
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
176
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the partial residues of EDTA. EDTA and metal complexes can be adsorbed onto solid soil phases, especially crystalline iron oxides (Nowack and Sigg, 1996;Voglar and Lestan, 2012b). It is known that the EDTA molecule contains multiple C and N atoms which could contribute to the results when soil organic matter and N concentration are measured.…”
Section: Metal Removal and Soil Properties Changes After Field Leachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to the partial residues of EDTA. EDTA and metal complexes can be adsorbed onto solid soil phases, especially crystalline iron oxides (Nowack and Sigg, 1996;Voglar and Lestan, 2012b). It is known that the EDTA molecule contains multiple C and N atoms which could contribute to the results when soil organic matter and N concentration are measured.…”
Section: Metal Removal and Soil Properties Changes After Field Leachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After EDTA leaching some metal-EDTA complexes are retained in the soil by the formation of bonds with soil iron oxides and especially goethite (Nowack and Sigg, 1996). Some of these bound complexes may be released and washed from the soil with irrigation water (Jelusic et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of metal contaminants with organic complexants may significantly influence their transport behavior i n the environment. [30][31][32] EDTA was used in this study as reactant (complexing agent) to induce and characterise iron dissolution from several materials.…”
Section: Iron Dissolution Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the aqueous Fe(II)-EDTA complex is rapidly transformed to the Fe(III)-EDTA complex (Santana-Casiano et al 2000), which exhibits a limited absorptivity allowing the Fe-EDTA complex to be transported away from the surface (Nowack and Sigg 1996;Wehrli et al 1989). As such, the dissolution of Amasteel is surface-controlled (not transport-controlled) and is proportional to the surface concentration of the complex that enhances dissolution (Bondietti et al 1993).…”
Section: Dependence Of Dissolution Rate On Edta Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the speciation of Fe(II) is controlled by the concentration of EDTA (Santana-Casiano et al 2000). Adsorption of EDTA onto goethite (Stumm 1997;Rubio and Matijevic 1979;Nowack and Sigg 1996;Nowack and Sigg 1997;Rueda et al 1985), lepidocrocite (Bondietti et al 1993;Rubio and Matijevic 1979), magnetite (Blesa et al 1984), hematite (Chang and Matijevic 1983) and hydrous ferric oxide (Nowack and Sigg 1997) Figure 5-3 illustrates the calculated dissolution rate of Amasteel in solutions with pH(23°C) = 9.0, 11.0, and 12.0 (Table 3- (Table 5-1). This suggests that complexation of aqueous iron by EDTA and hydroxyl ions at pH(23°C) = 10.0 results in further release of iron from the solid increasing the apparent dissolution rate (Chang and Matijevic 1983).…”
Section: Dependence Of Dissolution Rate On Edta Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%