The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1995
DOI: 10.1021/la00002a050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of DNA to Mica, Silylated Mica, and Minerals: Characterization by Atomic Force Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
181
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
10
181
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculation of the concentration of all ionic species for all buffers is explained in Supplementary Note 1 and summarized in Supplementary Table 1). Since monovalent cations are known to weaken the binding of DNA to mica 31,32,35,36 , we implemented the diffusion step by exchanging the buffer to one whose predominant cation is Na þ (B700 mM NaCl). During the diffusion step, we also mildly heated samples at a constant temperature (40°C, for B4 h; while heating above room temperature appears to facilitate the process, it is not essential for the surface diffusion of origami; evidence provided later).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Calculation of the concentration of all ionic species for all buffers is explained in Supplementary Note 1 and summarized in Supplementary Table 1). Since monovalent cations are known to weaken the binding of DNA to mica 31,32,35,36 , we implemented the diffusion step by exchanging the buffer to one whose predominant cation is Na þ (B700 mM NaCl). During the diffusion step, we also mildly heated samples at a constant temperature (40°C, for B4 h; while heating above room temperature appears to facilitate the process, it is not essential for the surface diffusion of origami; evidence provided later).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus divalent cations, such as Mg 2 þ and Ni 2 þ , are often described as mediating the binding of DNA to mica by bridging the negative charges on the DNA backbone and those on the mica 29,31,35,36,39 . This is a great simplification of divalent-cation-mediated DNA-mica binding, since the strength of binding for a particular cation concentration depends strongly on the identity of the cation, the size and geometry of the DNA object in question and the method of sample preparation.…”
Section: Control Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using 0.05 % v/v (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES)-modified mica (APmica) [9] was found ideal for polymer adsorption and AFM imaging purposes. The negatively charged sulfate groups of the carrageenans (pK a = 2) [10] interact ionically with the positively charged surface aliphatic amino groups of the AP-mica (pK a = 10.6) [11] providing an efficient immobilization.High resolution AFM imaging reveals individual, well separated polymer chains in condition of no added salt (0 mm) with an average chain height of about 0.3 nm for iota-as well as lambda-carrageenan (Figure 1 a,e and Figure S2 and S3). Analogous heights of about 0.3 to 0.5 nm were previously reported, [12,13] which is also in accordance with the estimated longitudinal axis of 0.3 nm for a hexose unit in its most stable 4 C 1 chair conformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using 0.05 % v/v (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES)-modified mica (APmica) [9] was found ideal for polymer adsorption and AFM imaging purposes. The negatively charged sulfate groups of the carrageenans (pK a = 2) [10] interact ionically with the positively charged surface aliphatic amino groups of the AP-mica (pK a = 10.6) [11] providing an efficient immobilization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%