2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Cr(VI) using thermally activated weed Salvinia cucullata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stirring speed 100-600 rpm was studied and 600 rpm was chosen to achieve kinetic parameter values, not affected by the stirring speed. This was comparable to the literature findings (Baral et al 2008). The reactor, containing 1 L aqueous Cr(VI) solution, was placed into a water bath to keep temperature constant at the desired level (23°C).…”
Section: Kinetic Studiessupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Stirring speed 100-600 rpm was studied and 600 rpm was chosen to achieve kinetic parameter values, not affected by the stirring speed. This was comparable to the literature findings (Baral et al 2008). The reactor, containing 1 L aqueous Cr(VI) solution, was placed into a water bath to keep temperature constant at the desired level (23°C).…”
Section: Kinetic Studiessupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Nevertheless, there are also systems whose behaviour can be predicted well by Eq. (11) and the obtained k 1 values are independent of c in [123][124][125][126][127][128][129]. There exist approaches able to offer theoretical interpretation of the pseudo-first order equation in which k 1 is or is not a function of c in .…”
Section: The Pseudo-first Order Equationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, there exist some exemplary systems [87,100,123] for which one can observe, as it was possible in the case of the pseudo-second equation, that Eq. (11) also does not seem to be much sensitive to the changes in the kinetic mechanism, influencing the kinetics of sorption.…”
Section: The Pseudo-first Order Equationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…activated carbon, fly ash, chitosan, zeolite, montmorillonite, sphagnum moss peat, kaolinite, wollastonite, bentonite, saw-dust, sea weeds, alumina, soya cake, redmud, etc. which have been frequently reported for the removal of metallic pollutants from aqueous solutions and wastewaters (Ayuso et al, 2007;Baral et al, 2008). Among them activated carbon is most promising, but its high cost always limits its large-scale application to developed nations (Acar and Malkoc, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%