2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of CO2 on ZSM-5 and Cu-MOF at room temperature and low pressure conditions for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the nanoparticle coming from a biomass byproduct precursor in which other components may interact with CO 2 molecules and/or geological media. , Moreover, this effect could be related to the CO 2 quadrupole moment, which allows CO 2 –CO 2 interaction at high-pressure conditions and surface interactions . Moreover, it should be remarked that the CO 2 sorption capacities reported in the present work are competitive and, in some cases, superior to those found in the literature, including materials with a more complex synthesis process or more stages. ,− Similar to the SS, the nitrogen sorption is null regarding the CO 2 sorption for all systems evaluated, highlighting the selectivity of the synthesized materials for CO 2 sorption in flue gas currents. Parameters of the Langmuir model are shown in Tables S5 to S8 where a trend is observed according to an increase in the sorption capacity of each sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be explained by the nanoparticle coming from a biomass byproduct precursor in which other components may interact with CO 2 molecules and/or geological media. , Moreover, this effect could be related to the CO 2 quadrupole moment, which allows CO 2 –CO 2 interaction at high-pressure conditions and surface interactions . Moreover, it should be remarked that the CO 2 sorption capacities reported in the present work are competitive and, in some cases, superior to those found in the literature, including materials with a more complex synthesis process or more stages. ,− Similar to the SS, the nitrogen sorption is null regarding the CO 2 sorption for all systems evaluated, highlighting the selectivity of the synthesized materials for CO 2 sorption in flue gas currents. Parameters of the Langmuir model are shown in Tables S5 to S8 where a trend is observed according to an increase in the sorption capacity of each sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The authors obtained that sandstone adsorptive capacity increased from 0.0013 mmol g –1 (nontreated) up to 0.64 mmol g –1 (impregnated with 20 wt % of carbon nanoparticles). Similarly, many nanomaterials have been developed to enhance the efficiency of CO 2 sorption commonly used in surface facilities, including zeolites, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and carbon-based and alumina-silicate nanomaterials, among others. ,, Pham et al developed nanozeolites with a CO 2 adsorption capacity of 4.81 mmol g –1 (at 20 °C and 1 atm). Regarding metal–organic frameworks materials, a wide variety is reported in the literature with several differences in their structure and composition corresponding to a wide range of CO 2 capture efficiency with reported average values of CO 2 adsorption from 0.3 up to 6.0 mmol g –1 or even higher depending on the composition and conditions of pressure and temperature, such as is described by Ding et al and Ghanbari et al Between them, silica-based nanomaterials have many advantages associated with their chemical stability, simple synthesis, and high surface area. , In recent years, researchers such as Li et al studied the influence of silica types in the performance and synthesis by grafting amine–silica hybrid materials used for postcombustion CO 2 capture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas for Cu-MOF they were 102-149 m and 1.7-1400 m 2 , respectively. 67 The results demonstrate that Zn-MOF works well in the low-pressure system with a higher CO 2 adsorption capability. Under ideal circumstances, the CO 2 adsorption of Zn-MOF was 145.1.…”
Section: Carbon Capture and Storage (Ccs)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Under ideal circumstances, the CO 2 adsorption of Zn-MOF was 145.1. 68 In order to create effective CO 2 adsorbents, a combination of Cu-BTC framework with porous carbon materials such as ordered mesoporous non-activated carbon (OMC), ordered mesoporous activated carbon (AC), and nitrogen-containing microporous carbon (NC) was used to form a NC–Cu-BTC composite with the maximum CO 2 capacity, measuring 8.24 and 4.51 mmol g −1 under 1 bar at 0 and 25 °C, respectively. 69 The lowest parasitic energy (PE) for postcombustion CO 2 collection has been observed in a nickel isonicotinate-based ultramicroporous MOF.…”
Section: Mofs Vs Traditional Materials: a Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorbents for CO 2 show advantages such as wider temperature range operation, less harmful disposal, yield, less waste generation, and weak bonding with CO 2 , resulting in lower regeneration energy [ 20 ]. Among different materials for CO 2 adsorption, such as activated carbon (AC) [ 13 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], biomass/biowaste [ 24 , 25 ], zeolite [ 26 , 27 ], graphene [ 28 ], metal-organic frameworks [ 29 , 30 ], biochar [ 31 , 32 ] has been highlighted in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%