2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of CO2 on Activated Carbons Prepared by Chemical Activation with Cupric Nitrate

Abstract: Activated carbons were prepared from a lignocellulosic material, African palm shells (Elaeis guineensis), by chemical impregnation of the precursor with solutions of 1–7% w/v Cu­(NO3)2 at five different concentrations. These were carbonized in a carbon dioxide atmosphere at 1073 K to obtain different carbons. Their textural properties were characterized by nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption isotherms in order to evaluate the pore-size distribution. The immersion enthalpies of the activated carbons in benze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 tabulates each experimental condition in terms of coded variables and response values. It can be seen that case 1 exhibited the highest production yield, but the lowest CO 2 adsorption, whilst case 5 showed the maximum adsorption capacity with an extremely low production yield but still in the acceptable range of the dry biomass-derived ACs, of 5–40 wt% 52 , while the lowest production yield was obtained at case 6 . Table 5 illustrates the ANOVA analysis of these two response variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 4 tabulates each experimental condition in terms of coded variables and response values. It can be seen that case 1 exhibited the highest production yield, but the lowest CO 2 adsorption, whilst case 5 showed the maximum adsorption capacity with an extremely low production yield but still in the acceptable range of the dry biomass-derived ACs, of 5–40 wt% 52 , while the lowest production yield was obtained at case 6 . Table 5 illustrates the ANOVA analysis of these two response variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of the parental biochar and all ACs prepared by steam activation at 700–900 °C for 1–2 h. The FTIR spectrum of the biochar that appeared at a wavenumber lower than 920 cm −1 indicated the presence of aromatic C–H out-of-plane bending 51 . Bands of intensity between wavenumbers of 920–1300 cm −1 are the overlapping C–O stretchings of various surface groups, including the C–O vibration of ethers (942–1300 cm −1 ), esters (1100–1250 cm −1 ), cyclic ethers (1140 cm −1 ), lactonic groups (1160–1370 cm −1 ), phenolic groups (1180–1220 cm −1 ), and also carboxylic acids and cyclic anhydrides (1180–1300 cm −1 ) 52 . The bands at 1480–1650 cm −1 indicated the presence of polyaromatic C=C stretching vibration of sp 2 hybridized carbons 52 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, solid adsorbent has been widely studied and recommended to be an alternative technology due to its simplicity, low operational requirements, low cost, ease of control, and high adsorption efficiency. Generally, various types of solid adsorbent have been explored to have a suitable candidate for CO2 capture, including mesoporous silicon [3][4][5][6], activated carbon [7], carbon nanotube [8], metal-organic framework [9], zeolite [10], aerogel [11,12], polymers [13] and many others. Porous organic polymers are broadly exploited and have been classified into various forms such as hyper-cross-linked polymers, conjugated microporous polymers and grafted fibrous sheets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other CO 2 capture attempts were performed with materials such metal-inorganic-organic core-shell material [9], chemically modified activated carbon with nitric acid and ammonium aqueous solutions [10], cupric nitrate [11] or polyacrylonitrile [12], functionalized carbonaceous and silica-based materials [13], zeolites and layered double hydroxides [14][15][16], metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), mesoporous silica, clay, porous carbons, porous organic polymers (POP), and metal oxides (MO) [16]. Most of these materials involve costly/sophisticated synthesis procedures but low surface affinity as reported to their specific surface area as defined earlier [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%