1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of BSA on Highly Carboxylated Microspheres—Quantitative Effects of Surface Functional Groups and Interaction Forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
114
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
114
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such significant generation of signal intensity is a direct function of presence of surface -COOH groups. Among different forces that control the interaction between proteins and supporting surfaces, hydrogen binding and hydrophobic interaction are the most dominant ones (Yoon et al 1996). Yoon et al in an extensive research work concluded that between these two major forces, hydrogen binding can perform in a stronger manner than hydrophobic interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such significant generation of signal intensity is a direct function of presence of surface -COOH groups. Among different forces that control the interaction between proteins and supporting surfaces, hydrogen binding and hydrophobic interaction are the most dominant ones (Yoon et al 1996). Yoon et al in an extensive research work concluded that between these two major forces, hydrogen binding can perform in a stronger manner than hydrophobic interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from hydrophobic interaction, available surface -COOH groups in PHB fibers which are coated by comp. (9:1) provide the second chance for proteins to be accommodated on the surface in an even more substantial manner, hydrogen binding (Yoon et al 1996). In that sense, the question might be raised regarding relatively lower performances of PHB fibers coated with other two compositions, comp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present case, polymer-coated PHBV fibers create the platform for the mentioned physical Among several different forces that have an impact on biomolecular interfaces, three main interactions are known as the most influential driving forces in analyte-surface binding. The forces that have frequently been reported in the literature for their considerable impact on protein immobilization are as follows: electrostatic (ionic) attraction, hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen (H) bonding [24,36,37]. The ionic attraction is sensitive to pH changes and is relatively weak in comparison to other two forces while H-bonding facilitates the most substantial protein attachment [36].…”
Section: Morphology Analysis Of the Coated And Uncoated Poly(3-hydroxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forces that have frequently been reported in the literature for their considerable impact on protein immobilization are as follows: electrostatic (ionic) attraction, hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen (H) bonding [24,36,37]. The ionic attraction is sensitive to pH changes and is relatively weak in comparison to other two forces while H-bonding facilitates the most substantial protein attachment [36]. In the present case, polymer-coated PHBV fibers create the platform for the mentioned physical Among several different forces that have an impact on biomolecular interfaces, three main interactions are known as the most influential driving forces in analyte-surface binding.…”
Section: Morphology Analysis Of the Coated And Uncoated Poly(3-hydroxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its major significance, numerous experimental works have been devoted to quantify protein, in particular Fb adsorption on various substrates using the solution depletion methods (Ramsden 1993), the gravimetric methods, especially the quartz microbalance (QCM) (Reisch et al 2009;Choi et al 2002), optical methods such as ellipsometry and reflectometry (Melmsten 1994;Buijs et al 1996Buijs et al , 1997, fluorescence methods such as the total internal fluorescence (TIRF) (Yoon et al 1996;Wertz and Santore 2001) and isotope labeling (Zembala and Dejardin 1994;Zembala et al 1998). For the low coverage range the electron microscopy and the AFM methods can be quite efficient in a direct determination of protein coverage (Hall and Slayter 1959;Veklich et al 1993;Ortega-Vinuesa et al 1998;Sit 1999;Marchin and Berrie 2003;Toscano and Santore 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%