2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of arsenic ions on Brazilian sepiolite: Effect of contact time, pH, concentration, and calorimetric investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Adsorption is the most preferred method for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions due to its simplicity and its high A. T. Sdiri (&) Á T. Higashi Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan e-mail: alisdiri@yahoo.fr effectiveness (Sdiri et al 2011(Sdiri et al , 2012a. In this regards, multiple researchers studied the effectiveness of various type of clay in removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions including kaolinite (Sari et al 2007;Schaller et al 2009), bentonite (Ulmanu et al 2003;Kaya and Hakan Ö ren 2005;Eren et al 2009), illite (Ozdes et al 2011), sepiolite (Guerra et al 2010), montmorillonite (Lin and Juang 2002), and other adsorbents (Al-Degs et al 2006;Engates and Shipley 2011). Many other studies have been undertaken to evaluate the adsorptive capacity of various bioadsorbents in the removal of inorganic pollutants (Ahmad et al 2010;Das 2012;Dubey and Shiwani 2012;Revathi et al 2012;Eren 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption is the most preferred method for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions due to its simplicity and its high A. T. Sdiri (&) Á T. Higashi Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan e-mail: alisdiri@yahoo.fr effectiveness (Sdiri et al 2011(Sdiri et al , 2012a. In this regards, multiple researchers studied the effectiveness of various type of clay in removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions including kaolinite (Sari et al 2007;Schaller et al 2009), bentonite (Ulmanu et al 2003;Kaya and Hakan Ö ren 2005;Eren et al 2009), illite (Ozdes et al 2011), sepiolite (Guerra et al 2010), montmorillonite (Lin and Juang 2002), and other adsorbents (Al-Degs et al 2006;Engates and Shipley 2011). Many other studies have been undertaken to evaluate the adsorptive capacity of various bioadsorbents in the removal of inorganic pollutants (Ahmad et al 2010;Das 2012;Dubey and Shiwani 2012;Revathi et al 2012;Eren 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of natural adsorbents is particularly beneficial for the development of cost effective process for heavy metal removal from wastewater. In this regards, many previous works have been undertaken to study the efficiency of various type of clay including kaolinite [1,2], bentonite [3,4], sepiolite [5], montmorillonite [6] and other natural adsorbents [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of natural adsorbents is particularly beneficial for the development of cost effective process for heavy metal removal from wastewaters. In this regards, multiple researchers studied the effectiveness of various type of clay in removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions, including kaolinite (Sari et al 2007a;Schaller et al 2009), Celtek clay (Sari et al 2007b), bentonite (Ulmanu et al 2003; Kaya and Hakan Ören 2005), sepiolite (Guerra et al 2010), montmorillonite (Lin and Juang 2002) and other natural adsorbents (Al-Degs et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%