2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp00015f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of a water molecule on the MgO(100) surface as described by cluster and slab models

Abstract: The interaction of a water molecule with the (100) surface of MgO as described by cluster models is studied using MP2, coupled MP2 (MP2C) and symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) methods. In addition, diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) results are presented for several slab models as well as for the smallest, 2X2 cluster model. For the 2X2 model it is found that the MP2C, DMC, and CCSD(T) methods give nearly the same potential energy curve for the water-cluster interaction, whereas the potential energy curve f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Karaltis et al reported a benchmark energy value of 0.48 eV for water monomer adsorption on MgO(001) based on diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) calculations for a 2-layer slab. 41 Our vdW-DF-cx and optPBE-vdW values for the monomer/MgO(001) system agree quite well with their value. We note, however, that the two benchmark values for monomer adsorption that we refer to in our paper, namely, the CCSD(T) value for NaCl 14 and the DMC value for MgO, 41 are very similar in magnitude, which we find slightly disturbing, as the molecule on MgO should be expected to be more strongly bound.…”
Section: A Adsorption Energies From Calculations and Comparisons To supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Karaltis et al reported a benchmark energy value of 0.48 eV for water monomer adsorption on MgO(001) based on diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) calculations for a 2-layer slab. 41 Our vdW-DF-cx and optPBE-vdW values for the monomer/MgO(001) system agree quite well with their value. We note, however, that the two benchmark values for monomer adsorption that we refer to in our paper, namely, the CCSD(T) value for NaCl 14 and the DMC value for MgO, 41 are very similar in magnitude, which we find slightly disturbing, as the molecule on MgO should be expected to be more strongly bound.…”
Section: A Adsorption Energies From Calculations and Comparisons To supporting
confidence: 78%
“…204 The largest calculations of this kind involve a SAPT0 analysis of the interaction between benzene (or its fluorinated derivatives) and a graphene nanoflake as large as C 150 H 30. 205,206 In addition to adsorption on carbon nanostructures, interactions between small molecules and cluster models of other surfaces such as MgO, 207 TiO 2 , 208 or a metal organic framework 209 have also been subjected to the SAPT and/or SAPT(DFT) decompositions.…”
Section: 122mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents the leading error of a DMC calculation, but it benefits from a number of appealing properties which contrast with quantum chemical methods, such as a very minor dependence on basis set, as well as a low-scaling with respect to system size. DMC techniques are increasingly used to understand molecular adsorption at periodic surfaces 4,5,11,12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%