2018
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/80962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption Mechanism of Heavy Metals in Heavy Metal/Pesticide Coexisting Sediment Systems through Factional Factorial Design Assisted by 2D-QSAR Models

Abstract: Resolution V of the 2 10-3 fractional factorial design method was used to identify the main effects and second-order interaction effects of pollutants (copper, cadmium, lead, zinc, nickel, dimethoate, metalaxyl, atrazine, malathion, and prometryn) on metals adsorption onto sediments, and 2D-QSAR models were established to reveal the relationships between metal ion characteristics and the effects of pollutants on metals adsorption. The effects on Cd adsorption were attributed to the main effects of pollutant fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that as was the case for the resolution IV 2 method (for which the contributions of the significant main effects and second-order interaction effects of the pollutant factor concentrations on absorption of sediment to metalaxyl were 21% and 79%, respectively), the second-order effects had most influence on absorption of sediment to metalaxyl for the resolution IV 2 10-5 method. Also, the same as the research by Wang et al [33], second-order interaction effects were primarily responsible for metalaxyl (the rates of contributions were 79.05%) in the pesticide/ heavy metals coexisting sediment system. There was also some overlap between the main effects and secondorder interaction effects for the resolution V 2 and resolution IV 2 10-5 methods that had a significant effect on metalaxyl adsorption on the sediment, namely when the main effect was copper and the second-order interaction effect was atrazine*copper.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Difference Between Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This shows that as was the case for the resolution IV 2 method (for which the contributions of the significant main effects and second-order interaction effects of the pollutant factor concentrations on absorption of sediment to metalaxyl were 21% and 79%, respectively), the second-order effects had most influence on absorption of sediment to metalaxyl for the resolution IV 2 10-5 method. Also, the same as the research by Wang et al [33], second-order interaction effects were primarily responsible for metalaxyl (the rates of contributions were 79.05%) in the pesticide/ heavy metals coexisting sediment system. There was also some overlap between the main effects and secondorder interaction effects for the resolution V 2 and resolution IV 2 10-5 methods that had a significant effect on metalaxyl adsorption on the sediment, namely when the main effect was copper and the second-order interaction effect was atrazine*copper.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Difference Between Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In recent studies, including molecule design [31], the exploration of factors affecting drug properties [32], and the adsorption of heavy mental/pesticides [33,34], have already used a fractional factorial design with a resolution of V to explore the main effects and interaction effects between the different factors. As for the research of competitive adsorption of heavy mental and pesticides, it was mostly among different heavy metals or different pesticides.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Difference Between Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the heavy metal properties, a larger hydrated ionic radius or radius of heavy metals is reported to decrease the adsorption capacity. This is because a large hydrated ionic radius can reduce the binding strength of metal–OC or metal–clay complexation, lower the charge density to reduce the electrostatic interactions between the heavy metals and soil surfaces, and/or limit the access of heavy metals to small pores. A high first IE would reduce atom ionization, which is one of the significant steps in adsorption through the formation of metal–organic complexes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[60][61][62] For soil 2, the amount of the released Zn and Fe increased with the presence of metalaxyl. For metalaxyl, this so-called antagonistic effect has been mentioned for Zn [63] and has not yet been interpreted. [63] In parallel, as observed for soil 1, the amounts of the released Fe and Zn decreased as a function of the added acid metabolite.…”
Section: Behavior Of the Soils As A Function Of Metalaxyl And Cga 62 828 Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%