1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption in Sparse Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of V p is compatible with the increase of characteristic size x of the fractal cluster as observed by SAXS (Table 1), because as larger is the quantity of SDS micelles, larger are the spaces filled by the surfactant during the earlier gelation process, increasing the pore volume and the fractal cluster size. The apparent discrepancy in V p found in the sample with C R ¼ 100 (V p was unexpectedly found smaller in this sample with respect to other samples prepared with SDS) could be explained because conventional nitrogen adsorption can underestimate the pore volume in a sparse silica network, since the adsorbate/vapor interface can adopt a surface of zero curvature while much of the larger pores remains empty [31,32]. The extent of the phenomenon is larger as larger the pore/particle size ratio, Fig.…”
Section: Nitrogen Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase of V p is compatible with the increase of characteristic size x of the fractal cluster as observed by SAXS (Table 1), because as larger is the quantity of SDS micelles, larger are the spaces filled by the surfactant during the earlier gelation process, increasing the pore volume and the fractal cluster size. The apparent discrepancy in V p found in the sample with C R ¼ 100 (V p was unexpectedly found smaller in this sample with respect to other samples prepared with SDS) could be explained because conventional nitrogen adsorption can underestimate the pore volume in a sparse silica network, since the adsorbate/vapor interface can adopt a surface of zero curvature while much of the larger pores remains empty [31,32]. The extent of the phenomenon is larger as larger the pore/particle size ratio, Fig.…”
Section: Nitrogen Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The lower rate of diminution of r N2 compared to r x with increasing the SDS quantity (and the abnormal high value found for r N2 in the sample with C R ¼ 100) could be explained because the underestimating of the pore volume by nitrogen condensation in sparse silica networks [31,32], as mentioned earlier, is larger as larger the pore/particle size ratio, which was expected to be larger in APD aerogels prepared with higher SDS quantities, particularly for the sample with C R ¼ 100. The bulk densities r gly were found not too dependent on the SDS quantity, presenting a typical value of about 0.20 g/cm 3 (Table 4), which is about 30% smaller than the typical values found for r x and r N2 .…”
Section: Saxs and Nitrogen Adsorption Correlation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no article on the application of SiO 2 aerogels as supercapacitors. SiO 2 aerogels possess structural advantages for electrochemical energy storage as follows: (1) high surface areas (>500 m 2 g −1 ), which amplify the amount of electrifiable interface [7][8][9]; (2) mesoporosity, which provides both molecular accessibility and rapid mass transport via diffusion [7,[9][10][11][12][13]; (3) a threedimensional network of nanometer-sized solid particles, which promotes efficient electronic conduction [9,10]; and (4) nanoscale particle sizes, which minimize solid-state transport distances for ion-insertion reactions [9,13]. Based on these features, SiO 2 aerogels can be a desirable material for supercapacitors in organic electrolyte.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an intense investigation of aerogels started in the 1980s, nitrogen adsorption and desorption (NAD) has been applied to this class of porous materials to determine specific surface areas and pore size distributions (e.g., (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)). While the surface areas extracted from NAD generally are consistent with data derived via other methods (e.g., SAXS (8) and TEM (9)), the total pore volume significantly failed to be fully detected for samples with porosities above 85 to 90% (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%