2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption equilibrium models: Computation of confidence regions of parameter estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approximation is valid when comparing the measurement variance for the three experiments (Exp4, Exp5, and Exp6) that represent replications (details in Section ). The parameter covariance matrix V θ ( P × P ) is then given by , bold-italicV θ = s normalR 2 false( bold-italicB normalT bold-italicB false) 1 where B is the sensitivity matrix of dimension ( N × P ). The matrix B was obtained as a block matrix with N e sensitivity matrices B e of dimension ( K e N y × P ). bold-italicB = [ lefttrue B 1 B 2 B N e ] bold-italicB e = bold-italicy e bold-italicθ where y e is the vector that contains all k discrete time points of all measured variables for a calibration experiment e bold-italicy e = false{ y false( 1 , k false) , 0.25em y false( 2 , k false) , ··· , 0.25em y false( N <...…”
Section: Population Balance Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation is valid when comparing the measurement variance for the three experiments (Exp4, Exp5, and Exp6) that represent replications (details in Section ). The parameter covariance matrix V θ ( P × P ) is then given by , bold-italicV θ = s normalR 2 false( bold-italicB normalT bold-italicB false) 1 where B is the sensitivity matrix of dimension ( N × P ). The matrix B was obtained as a block matrix with N e sensitivity matrices B e of dimension ( K e N y × P ). bold-italicB = [ lefttrue B 1 B 2 B N e ] bold-italicB e = bold-italicy e bold-italicθ where y e is the vector that contains all k discrete time points of all measured variables for a calibration experiment e bold-italicy e = false{ y false( 1 , k false) , 0.25em y false( 2 , k false) , ··· , 0.25em y false( N <...…”
Section: Population Balance Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when we are dealing with complex nonlinear problems with multiple optima (as in the case of surface complexation model fitting), the assumption that the confidence region is an ellipsoid is obviously very far from reality because these regions could be not only nonelliptical but even unbounded, nonconvex and composed of unconnected parts. In this case, likelihood confidence regions could be used as a more accurate representation of obtained solution uncertainty (Schwaab et al, 2008;Tolazzi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…greater than or close to 0.9. Redlich-Peterson model combines elements of the Langmuir and Freundlich models, so that in low concentrations it follows the Langmuir model and in high concentrations it follows Freundlich model [32]. However, when the value of β is close to 1, the parameters qm and KR are reduced to the parameters qm and K L of Langmuir [32].…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redlich-Peterson model combines elements of the Langmuir and Freundlich models, so that in low concentrations it follows the Langmuir model and in high concentrations it follows Freundlich model [32]. However, when the value of β is close to 1, the parameters qm and KR are reduced to the parameters qm and K L of Langmuir [32]. Another interpretation that can be adopted is that the R-P model indicates a Freundlich isotherm when the constants KR and a R >>1 and β =1 [33].…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%