2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption behaviour of direct yellow 50 onto cotton fiber: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that the first stage was corresponded to macropores or mesopores diffusion and the second stage was ascribed to micropores diffusion for the porous materials. The parameter α represents thickness of boundary layer, and the larger the parameter α is, the thicker the boundary layer and greater contribution of surface adsorption in the rate‐controlling step . For EGCG and CAF adsorbed by PSt, the values of α for the first stage were negative, indicating macropores did not exist in the resin, and the first stage was ascribed to mesopores diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the first stage was corresponded to macropores or mesopores diffusion and the second stage was ascribed to micropores diffusion for the porous materials. The parameter α represents thickness of boundary layer, and the larger the parameter α is, the thicker the boundary layer and greater contribution of surface adsorption in the rate‐controlling step . For EGCG and CAF adsorbed by PSt, the values of α for the first stage were negative, indicating macropores did not exist in the resin, and the first stage was ascribed to mesopores diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter C denotes thickness of boundary layer. The larger the C is, the thicker the boundary layer and greater contribution of surface adsorption in the rate-controlling step [33]. It can be seen that for all the adsorption systems, the values of C from the second stage and third stage were larger than those from the first stage, indicating boundary layer effect significantly affected the adsorption of oleuropein from large pores to small pores, and capillary effect may take place at the two intersections.…”
Section: Adsorption Kinetics Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It can be noted that the removal percent increased with the increase in the adsorbent dose while the adsorption capacity was decreased. The increase of the removal percent due to increase the surface area of adsorbent whatever, increase the number of active sites which are available for adsorption leading to the increase in the removal percent [23]. However, the adsorption capacity decreased as the adsorbent dosage increased due to at a higher adsorbent dosage the available active sites on the adsorbent increased compared with the lower adsorbent dosage.…”
Section: Adsorption Studymentioning
confidence: 99%