2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7208(03)00027-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption behavior of direct dye on cotton in non-aqueous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors found the adsorption capacities of cotton for acid blue 25, acid yellow 99 and reactive yellow 23 to be 589, 448 and 302 mg g À1 , respectively. Adsorption behaviour of direct dye on cotton in Aerosol-OT (AOT) reverse micellar system was studied by Sawada and Ueda (2003), exhaustion of dye was suggested to be perfect and superior to that in aqueous system. In a study to evaluate the performance of cotton waste for dye removal, McKay et al (1999) found that the cotton waste had the potential to adsorb 875 and 277 mg g À1 of basic red 2 and basic blue 9, respectively.…”
Section: Low-cost Alternative Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found the adsorption capacities of cotton for acid blue 25, acid yellow 99 and reactive yellow 23 to be 589, 448 and 302 mg g À1 , respectively. Adsorption behaviour of direct dye on cotton in Aerosol-OT (AOT) reverse micellar system was studied by Sawada and Ueda (2003), exhaustion of dye was suggested to be perfect and superior to that in aqueous system. In a study to evaluate the performance of cotton waste for dye removal, McKay et al (1999) found that the cotton waste had the potential to adsorb 875 and 277 mg g À1 of basic red 2 and basic blue 9, respectively.…”
Section: Low-cost Alternative Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these techniques, adsorption is generally preferred due to easy handling, high efficiency, low energy input, and availability of different adsorbents [6,7]. Wastewater treatment has been studied using clay/basic [8], chitosan [9], cotton [10], montmorillonite [11], sepiolite/methyl green, and natural zeolite/basic [12]. However, the application of these materials is practically limited because the adsorbent is not available in sufficient amounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both granular or powdered activated carbon (AC) [9][10][11][12][13] and different low cost adsorbents (LCA) like coir pith [14], clay [15], bagasse, fly ash [16], mesoporous minerals [17], sawdust [18], alunite [19], banana peel [20], biomass [21,22] and others adsorbent like polymer [23], cotton [24] etc are used for removal of toxic dyes from effluent. Adsorption capacities of commercial AC for reactive dyes generally vary from 7.69 to 1179 mg/g [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%