2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption behavior and mechanism of Hg (II) on a porous core-shell copper hydroxy sulfate@MOF composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the adsorption mechanism of CHAP-SH for Hg(II) was mainly chemisorption, including electron exchange and ion exchange between CHAP-SH and Hg(II), and its adsorption rate was limited by chemisorption. 39 , 40 Table 1 shows that the fitting value of the pseudo-second-order model was consistent with the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the adsorption mechanism of CHAP-SH for Hg(II) was mainly chemisorption, including electron exchange and ion exchange between CHAP-SH and Hg(II), and its adsorption rate was limited by chemisorption. 39 , 40 Table 1 shows that the fitting value of the pseudo-second-order model was consistent with the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Table indicates that the correlation coefficient ( R 2 = 0.9614) of the pseudo-second-order model was closer to 1 than that of the pseudo-first-order model ( R 2 = 0.8888), indicating that the adsorption process of CHAP-SH on Hg­(II) could be better described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Therefore, the adsorption mechanism of CHAP-SH for Hg­(II) was mainly chemisorption, including electron exchange and ion exchange between CHAP-SH and Hg­(II), and its adsorption rate was limited by chemisorption. , Table shows that the fitting value of the pseudo-second-order model was consistent with the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, it also can find that adsorption capacity of Hg( ii ) is the lowest at pH = 2 due to the H + competition for adsorption sites. 36,37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, it also can nd that adsorption capacity of Hg(II) is the lowest at pH = 2 due to the H + competition for adsorption sites. 36,37 However, as the solution pH increases continuously, the concentration of H + ions in the solution gradually decreases, and the H + in the -NHgroup in the polymer molecular chain is S1 (in the ESI †).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low pH, NH 2 on the surface of adsorbents were positively charged owing to protonation, thus the adsorption was impeded by a large repulsive forces between the protonated amino group Hg(II). Moreover, the existence of a large amount of H + in the solution may compete adsorption with Hg(II) ( Zhang et al, 2021 ). The deprotonation of the NH 2 on adsorbents can effectively coordinate with Hg(II), resulting in increased uptake of Hg(II) as pH increased from 1.0 to 5.0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%