1991
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(91)85055-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption and elution of bovine γ-globulin using an affinity membrane containing hydrophobic amino acids as ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An affinity system using stacked membranes in this study has a considerably sharper breakthrough curve than one using hollow fibers, as shown by data from Kim et al (1991) andfrom lwata et al (1991). This behavior can be explained on the basis of the following analysis.…”
Section: Calculation Of Breakthrough Curves With Stacked Membranessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…An affinity system using stacked membranes in this study has a considerably sharper breakthrough curve than one using hollow fibers, as shown by data from Kim et al (1991) andfrom lwata et al (1991). This behavior can be explained on the basis of the following analysis.…”
Section: Calculation Of Breakthrough Curves With Stacked Membranessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Kim et al used hydrophobic amino acids (e.g., phenylalanine and tryptophan) containing membranes based on polyethylene and they obtained 50 mg N (g polymer) -1 for bovine gamma globulin. [22] Müller-Schulte et al used several polymeric carriers made of different polymers including Biograft, Sepharose 4B, Superose and Spherosil and histidine as the pseudospecific ligand. [23] Their maximum IgG 1 adsorption values were in the range of 0.05-0.23 (mg IgG 1 ) N (mL sorbent) -1 .…”
Section: Comparison With Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 for details). In further experiments we found that XL Y does not bind nonspecifically to unrelated proteins such as bovine gamma globulin that display affinity for hydrophobic surfaces (62) (Fig. 3G).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%