1994
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(94)90621-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorbate induced relaxations of S/Ru(0001): p(2 × 2) and p(√3 × √3)R30° structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ru-S bond length in the relaxed structure is 2.32 Å, and the S adatom is about 1.602 Å (d S-Ru ) above the surface Ru layer. Both values are in good agreement with experimental values (bond length of 2.28 Å and interlayer spacing of 1.605 Å) obtained from the ordered p(2 Â 2)-S phase on Ru(0 0 0 1) [26]. The spacing between the first and the second Ru layer (d Ru1-Ru2 ) and the rumpling D \ of the first Ru layer are also fairly close to the experimental values of 2.115 Å and 0.03 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ru-S bond length in the relaxed structure is 2.32 Å, and the S adatom is about 1.602 Å (d S-Ru ) above the surface Ru layer. Both values are in good agreement with experimental values (bond length of 2.28 Å and interlayer spacing of 1.605 Å) obtained from the ordered p(2 Â 2)-S phase on Ru(0 0 0 1) [26]. The spacing between the first and the second Ru layer (d Ru1-Ru2 ) and the rumpling D \ of the first Ru layer are also fairly close to the experimental values of 2.115 Å and 0.03 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Jakob et al reported that Pt adatoms occupy both H and F sites on Ru(0 0 0 1), and form two types of island with different orientations [25]. For sulfur adsorption on Ru(0 0 0 1), a p(2 Â 2)-S superstructure was observed [26]. Diffusion of metal adatoms on some transition metal surfaces were investigated by using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) or field ion microscopy (FIM), and the following diffusion barriers were obtained, 0.16 eV for the Ag/Pt(1 1 1) system [27] and 0.097 eV for the Ag/Ag(1 1 1) system [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These efforts have included work on close-packed surfaces of transition (Co(0 0 0 1) [9], Ru(0 0 0 1) [27][28][29][30], Ir(1 1 1) [31], Ni(1 1 1) [32][33][34][35], Pd(1 1 1) [36][37][38][39][40], Pt(1 1 1) [41][42][43][44], Rh(1 1 1) [45][46][47]) and noble metals (Ag(1 1 1) [12,48,49], Au(1 1 1) [50][51][52], Cu(1 1 1) [53][54][55]). The formation of ( p 3 Â p 3) R30°structure on the (1 1 1) surfaces was frequently observed while the (2 Â 2) structure was commonly reported on the (0 0 0 1) face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental setup was described previously. 5 The main experimental results are obtained by measuring LEED spot profiles with a three-grid backview LEED optics and a charge-coupled device ͑CCD͒ camera. The following other methods were used: contact potential difference ͑CPD͒ monitored by a small three-electrode electron gun for coverage calibration, mass spectrometry with a quadrupole mass spectrometer, Auger electron spectroscopy using a cylindrical mirror analyzer for testing cleanness of adsorbate and substrate, and a high resolution spot profile analysis ͑SPA͒ LEED instrument for examining the structure of the substrate surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%