2008
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006312.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adrenaline (epinephrine) for the treatment of anaphylaxis with and without shock

Abstract: Based on this review, we are unable to make any new recommendations on the use of adrenaline for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Although there is a need for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of high methodological quality in order to define the true extent of benefits from the administration of adrenaline in anaphylaxis, such trials are unlikely to be performed in individuals with anaphylaxis. Indeed, they might be unethical because prompt treatment with adrenaline is deemed to be cri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A clear statement should be made to this effect in anaphylaxis guidelines (50). Although there is little direct evidence of harm associated with use of glucocorticoids, there is, as noted previously, persistent evidence that glucocorticoids are often inappropriately used as first-line agents in place of adrenaline, which is more likely to prove lifesaving (62). Consideration, therefore, needs to be given to conducting a RCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear statement should be made to this effect in anaphylaxis guidelines (50). Although there is little direct evidence of harm associated with use of glucocorticoids, there is, as noted previously, persistent evidence that glucocorticoids are often inappropriately used as first-line agents in place of adrenaline, which is more likely to prove lifesaving (62). Consideration, therefore, needs to be given to conducting a RCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Cochrane review on the use of epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis did not find any studies suitable for analysis. 86 A cohort study that analyzed the safety of an epinephrine infusion in patients with anaphylactic shock did not demonstrate any significant adverse effects. 87 Studies in animals have demonstrated potential benefit with the use of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin and methylene blue in animal models of anaphylactic shock.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5,[11][12][13][14][15][16] Because most cases of anaphylaxis occur in the out-of-hospital environment, it is imperative that EMS providers have the capability to administer epinephrine in a timely fashion. 5,7,11,17 Delayed administration of epinephrine is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, 13,15,[17][18][19] underscoring the importance for prehospital personnel to initiate treatment with epinephrine to patients presenting with anaphylaxis.…”
Section: Importance Of Early Administration Of Epinephrine In the Trementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many health care providers are hesitant to provide epinephrine to anaphylaxis patients out of concern for potential adverse effects, even though there are no absolute contraindications to the use of epinephrine for anaphylaxis. 2,5,14,16,27 There are indeed case reports of fatal cardiac arrhythmias and acute myocardial infarctions, among other cardiovascular and neurologic complications, in patients who received epinephrine during anaphylaxis. 17 However, these cases tend to occur in older patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Safety Profile Of Epinephrinementioning
confidence: 99%