2013
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2013.13144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adrenal venous sampling for stratifying patients for surgery of adrenal nodules detected using dynamic contrast enhanced CT

Abstract: ORIGINAL ARTICLE PURPOSE We aimed to assess the value of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) for diagnosing primary aldosteronism (PA) subtypes in patients with a unilateral nodule detected on adrenal computed tomography (CT) and scheduled for adrenalectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODSThis retrospective study included 80 consecutive patients with PA undergoing CT and AVS. Different lateralization indices were assessed, and a cutoff established using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The value of CT alone v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall positive predictive value of imaging for correctly identifying a unilaterally secreting adrenal gland was only 54%, with a negative predictive value of 49%. These findings are consistent with other reports in the literature .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The overall positive predictive value of imaging for correctly identifying a unilaterally secreting adrenal gland was only 54%, with a negative predictive value of 49%. These findings are consistent with other reports in the literature .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…PA can be generally subtyped into unilateral disease (including primarily aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs), and unilateral adrenal hyperplasia in rare cases) and bilateral disease (mainly bilateral hyperplasia) ( 5 , 6 ). Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) has been regarded as the standard for differentiating between the two disease subtypes ( 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 ), in contrast to cross-sectional imaging studies (computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%