2011
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADORA2A Gene Variation, Caffeine, and Emotional Processing: A Multi-level Interaction on Startle Reflex

Abstract: There is converging evidence for genetic, biochemical, and neuropsychological factors to increase the risk for anxiety and anxiety disorders. The pathogenesis of anxiety disorders is assumed to be influenced by a complex interaction of these individual risk factors on several levels, affecting intermediate phenotypes of anxiety such as the startle reflex. Thus, in the present double-blind, placebocontrolled study we attempted to paradigmatically investigate a multi-level pathogenetic model of anxiety by testin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study in White healthy volunteers did not replicate this association, although the authors state that this may have been because of differences between the American and German anxiety measurement assessment scales or dose of caffeine [30]. They did observe qualitative differences in startle reflex that were more pronounced in women and involved the interaction of rs5751876 genotype, caffeine, and type of stimuli, although they did not compare genotype groups directly [30]. ADORA2A rs5751876 is not associated with vasodilator response when exposed to adenosine and caffeine [32].…”
Section: Pharmacogenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study in White healthy volunteers did not replicate this association, although the authors state that this may have been because of differences between the American and German anxiety measurement assessment scales or dose of caffeine [30]. They did observe qualitative differences in startle reflex that were more pronounced in women and involved the interaction of rs5751876 genotype, caffeine, and type of stimuli, although they did not compare genotype groups directly [30]. ADORA2A rs5751876 is not associated with vasodilator response when exposed to adenosine and caffeine [32].…”
Section: Pharmacogenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, although the present results have been controlled for a potential impact of the ADORA2A 1976 T > C (rs5751876) variant, which has previously been found to be associated with anxiety-related phenotypes (Deckert et al 1998;Freitag et al 2010;Hamilton et al 2004;Hohoff et al 2009;Hohoff et al 2010) and subjective as well as psychophysiological anxiety responses to caffeine (Alsene et al 2003;Childs et al 2008;Rogers et al 2010;Domschke et al 2012), an influence of further anxietyrelevant genetic background, e.g., the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) (see Childs et al 2008), which has been suggested to play a role in setting up adaptive responses to cope with aversive environmental stimuli (de la Mora et al 2010), cannot be excluded. Finally, IAPS pictures used in the present study were matched regarding arousal level of unpleasant and pleasant pictures, but valence was higher for unpleasant as compared to pleasant pictures, which could have influenced our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Strom, unpublished data, http://ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl), were fulfilled for NPSR genotype distribution in the present sample (T/T, 20.2 %; A/T, 50.8 %; A/A, 29.0 %; p00.85). Given previous association findings of a silent polymorphism in exon 2 of the ADORA2A gene (rs5751876, 1976 T > C, formerly 1083 T > C, Tyr/Tyr) with anxiety-related phenotypes (Deckert et al 1998;Freitag et al 2010;Hamilton et al 2004;Hohoff et al 2009;Hohoff et al 2010) and subjective as well as psychophysiological anxiety responses to caffeine (Alsene et al 2003;Childs et al 2008;Rogers et al 2010;Domschke et al 2012), the present results were controlled for ADORA2A 1976 T > C genotype distribution (C/C, 23.3 %; C/T, 36.2 %; T/T, 40.5 %; for genotyping conditions, see Deckert et al (1998)). …”
Section: Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations