2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-3542(02)00068-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoptive transfer of HBV immunity by kidney transplantation and the effect of postoperative vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in animal models developed in mice14, in rats15 and in woodchucks16 confirmed that indeed immunity to HBV can be adoptively transferred even under conditions of immune suppression employed in organ transplantation. This was also reported in experimental heart and kidney transplantation 17. Finally, in the woodchuck model, liver transplantation from woodchuck hepatitis virus immune donors to woodchucks with persistent woodchuck hepatitis virus infection enabled control of the viral infection in transplanted animals 16.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Studies in animal models developed in mice14, in rats15 and in woodchucks16 confirmed that indeed immunity to HBV can be adoptively transferred even under conditions of immune suppression employed in organ transplantation. This was also reported in experimental heart and kidney transplantation 17. Finally, in the woodchuck model, liver transplantation from woodchuck hepatitis virus immune donors to woodchucks with persistent woodchuck hepatitis virus infection enabled control of the viral infection in transplanted animals 16.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…A different explanation of the serology results includes passive transfer of donor antibodies at the time of transplantation or transfer of donor lymphocytes with the graft, a phenomenon already depicted in organ transplantation . However, transmission of syphilis remains most likely, as indicated by progressive change with rise in antibody titer, detection of IgM (absent in the donor), recipient failure to show detectable levels of other antibodies that were also present in the donor (i.e., CMV IgG), and persistence of treponemal antibodies for 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative explanations for the results include passive transfer of donor antibodies at the time of transplantation or the transfer of donor lymphocytes with the graft, a phenomenon increasingly recognized in solid organ transplantation (13,14). The latter may lead to the establishment of a microchimeric state in the recipient with subsequent antibody production by donor-derived lymphocytes accounting for serologic changes post-transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%