2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of water conservation practices: A socioeconomic analysis of small-scale farmers in Central Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
42
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to results found by Jara-Rojas et al (2012), but in contrast to Pannell (1999) who reported that the adoption of SWC measures had been lower and slower than would be socially optimal due to factors such as high implementation costs. Chomba (2004) stated that decreasing cost of production and increasing access to services and resources to farmers had a positive effect on the use of conservation practices.…”
Section: Use Of Soil and Water Conservation (Swc) Practicessupporting
confidence: 36%
“…This is similar to results found by Jara-Rojas et al (2012), but in contrast to Pannell (1999) who reported that the adoption of SWC measures had been lower and slower than would be socially optimal due to factors such as high implementation costs. Chomba (2004) stated that decreasing cost of production and increasing access to services and resources to farmers had a positive effect on the use of conservation practices.…”
Section: Use Of Soil and Water Conservation (Swc) Practicessupporting
confidence: 36%
“…Los factores que influyen en la adopción de prácticas e innovaciones en el sector agropecuario son múltiples, algunos asociados a la presencia de diversos actores (10,11) , otros a diferentes estilos de producción y combinaciones de tecnologías y prácticas (12) , a los cambios a nivel institucional (13,14) , a la complejidad y adaptabilidad de las innovaciones mismas (9) , entre otros (15,16) . Sin embargo, uno de los factores que siempre está presente es la participación de agentes externos, principalmente los relacionados a los servicios de extensión agrícola.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The irrigation project is more likely to be adopted (joined) by: poorer farmers (unlike in [12,16,17,19]), who rely more on agriculture than those who rely on livestock activities (like in [15,25]); farmers who have been informed or trained by governmental agencies (like in [14,18,24]), and who feel that they can obtain fair prices for outputs (like in [13]); literate farmers (like in [12,17]); farmers with positive expectations about the future; farmers who base their decisions on a maximization approach rather than on a habit approach. On the other hand, the irrigation project is less likely to be joined by farmers who feel that they obtain fair prices for inputs (like in [13,14]), who have direct access to product markets, and who have satisfactory access to the private credit (loans) market (similar to [12]).…”
Section: The Econometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological interventions ( [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]), in general, and irrigation projects ( [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]), in particular, often result in a low level of awareness among the target group and in a low level of successful diffusion of the project (i.e., dissemination of knowledge leading to participation) because farmers are rarely consulted a priori about their specific circumstances, priority problems, and expectations. a duration model in the U.S. to estimate the long-term trends in the adoption and diffusion of technologies designed to reduce environmental externalities from agriculture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%