2019
DOI: 10.25300/misq/2019/12112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of Sustainable Technologies: A Mixed-Methods Study of German Households

Abstract: The authors develop a model of SMT adoption by drawing on existing models of technology adoption and psyhological ownership of information. The model is tested through a survey of paid qualtrics panel of homeowners in the United States. No smart meter specific constructs in the model. Specific focus on privacy-related concerns and shared benefits only.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling was based on a non-probabilistic procedure. The questionnaire was published via the internet, similar to other surveys about smart meters (e.g., Vassileva and Campillo, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Wunderlich et al, 2019). To ensure the sample was reflective of the population socio-demographics, respondents were invited to participate in the study using a variety of mediums.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling was based on a non-probabilistic procedure. The questionnaire was published via the internet, similar to other surveys about smart meters (e.g., Vassileva and Campillo, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Wunderlich et al, 2019). To ensure the sample was reflective of the population socio-demographics, respondents were invited to participate in the study using a variety of mediums.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Younger age groups were more like to adopt energy monitoring (Chen and Sintov, 2016) and smart meter technology (Wunderlich et al, 2019), whilst older people in the UK less likely to adopt smart electricity meter (Buchanan et al, 2016). Other studies show no effect (Chen et al, 2017;Nasir et al, 2020;Fettermann et al, 2021) Gender Binary (Male or female) Not typically a significant predictor (Chen and Sintov, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Nasir et al, 2020;Fettermann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Dependent Variables Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other studies show no effect (Chen et al, 2017;Nasir et al, 2020;Fettermann et al, 2021) Gender Binary (Male or female) Not typically a significant predictor (Chen and Sintov, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Nasir et al, 2020;Fettermann et al, 2021). Number of females predicts shower water usage (Makki et al, 2013) Highest level of education Three categories (secondary or below, A-levels, university)-dummy variables Not a significant predictor (Chen and Sintov, 2016;Bugden and Stedman, 2019;Wunderlich et al, 2019;Nasir et al, 2020). High educated respondents more likely to accept digital water meter (Koop et al, 2021) Household characteristics children (under 18) living in the household Binary (Yes or no) Household size not significant (Chen and Sintov, 2016;Wunderlich et al, 2019;Fettermann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Dependent Variables Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The authors followed the instructions for interpretive research from Klein and Myers (1999) to complete the data analysis. The authors used an inductive paradigm to make sense of the qualitative data (Wunderlich et al, 2019). Following Klein and Myers (1999), the authors adopted dynamic adjustment on the interview questions based on their interaction with the participants and iterated between the data and literature in the coding process, yielding three rounds of analysis.…”
Section: Study 1 Qualitative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%