2015
DOI: 10.1111/josh.12283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of Safe Routes to School in Canadian and the United States Contexts: Best Practices and Recommendations

Abstract: This article is the first attempt to examine SRTS at the state/provincial/city level to understand key adoption strategies using a realist approach. It found collaborative community-research partnerships that initiated SRTS and created cultural shifts in communities from the individual to policy level. Researchers, schools and communities interested in increasing school AT should consider SRTS as a valuable approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(100 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key successes and benefits include: a) generated capacity to recruit community partners towards a lasting and trusting relationship; b) generated capacity of the community partners and researcher; c) established and guiding terms of reference leading to culturally and logistically appropriate research; d) achieved all data collection activities; e) partnership synergy accumulated capacity to sustain project goals beyond post-the funding period. Similar findings have been reported in the literature (Israel et al, 2013;Jagosh et al, 2015;Jagosh et al, 2012;Macridis & Bengoechea, 2015; Schensul, Berg, & Nair, 2013).…”
Section: Key Findings Of Undertaking the Stp-processsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Key successes and benefits include: a) generated capacity to recruit community partners towards a lasting and trusting relationship; b) generated capacity of the community partners and researcher; c) established and guiding terms of reference leading to culturally and logistically appropriate research; d) achieved all data collection activities; e) partnership synergy accumulated capacity to sustain project goals beyond post-the funding period. Similar findings have been reported in the literature (Israel et al, 2013;Jagosh et al, 2015;Jagosh et al, 2012;Macridis & Bengoechea, 2015; Schensul, Berg, & Nair, 2013).…”
Section: Key Findings Of Undertaking the Stp-processsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…15 Though our literature search did not yield studies describing the role of CHCs in implementation of school nutrition programming, there is evidence that partnerships with state and local organizations and governments may result in: (1) beneficial outcomes for improving student academic, mental, and physical health, 16 (2) combining and streamlining of resources for student education and health, 17 (3) increasing selection of fruits and vegetables during school lunch, 18 and (4) adoption of active transportation best practices to increase physical activity of students. 19 Additionally, school collaboration with the Land Grant University Extension system has promising implications for nutrition education of students and parents. 20,21 Our initial interviews with CHCs indicated that coalitions view school wellness as an opportunity to promote nutrition education, school gardens, local foods, and effective/safe utilization of foods wasted during school meals.…”
Section: Whereasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive school program includes a few key components: Government and school board leadership should develop Comprehensive School PA Programs that include recess, intramurals, interschool sports, classroom PA breaks, and walk and bicycle to school initiatives Government should find ways to alter curriculum to require daily physical education and/or PA opportunities (eg, daily PA) Schools promote PA in schools by providing opportunities for intramurals and interschool sports, incorporating PA and outdoor education into different subjects (eg, walks outside for science), and participation in PA‐related activities and festivals (eg, active and safe routes to school, international walk to school day, bike rodeos) Schools can also work with community organizations to support and promote in and out of school PA activities and interventions that can help change behavior, especially those targeting older children and girls …”
Section: Implications For School Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%