2015
DOI: 10.7896/j.1521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of multiple agricultural technologies in maize production of the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
14
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other factors kept constant, being members of cooperatives was found to affect farmers' likelihood of the package adoption by the factor of 0.134, and the result was statistically significant at 1% level. The result conveys the message that cooperatives are among the strongest social institutions that play crucial roles in adoption of wheat technology packages, and also findings from the studies by Tesfaye et al (2001), Abebaw and Haile (2013) and Ahmed (2015) are consistent with this result.…”
Section: Econometric Results Determinants For Adoption Of Technology supporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other factors kept constant, being members of cooperatives was found to affect farmers' likelihood of the package adoption by the factor of 0.134, and the result was statistically significant at 1% level. The result conveys the message that cooperatives are among the strongest social institutions that play crucial roles in adoption of wheat technology packages, and also findings from the studies by Tesfaye et al (2001), Abebaw and Haile (2013) and Ahmed (2015) are consistent with this result.…”
Section: Econometric Results Determinants For Adoption Of Technology supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Many technology adoption studies emerging in crop sub-sector revealed that the gain from adoption is not satisfactory compared to the expectations, and hence further interventions on factors impeding these are suggested (Kotu et al, 2000;Dixon et al, 2006;Dercon and Christiaensen, 2011;Asfaw et al, 2012;Shiferaw et al, 2014;Ahmed, 2015;Jaleta et al, 2016;Yigezu et al, 2015;Beshir, 2016;Hagos, 2016;Seymour et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Local polynomial regression depicts a positive relationship between adoption level and productivity implying that productivity was significantly higher for those farmers who adopted SAMP (Figure 3). Ahmed (2015) found similar result in the case of maize production. Gray & Shadbegian (1998), Thapa (2007), Belay et al (2014), Moreno and Surinach (2014), Asfaw & Shiferaw (2010) also found that productivity of high adopters were greater than that of less adopter.…”
Section: Relationship Between Adoption Level and Productivitysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The MVP estimation technique considers the correlation in the error terms by jointly modelling the effects of a set of covariates on each of the improved agricultural technologies and estimates a set of binary probit models. It allows the relationship between the adoption of different improved production practices to be established, as well as potential correlations between unobserved disturbances (Ahmed, 2015;Kassie et al, 2009). Univariate models such as probit and logit ignore the correlation in the error terms of the adoption equation.…”
Section: Analytical Framework -The Multivariate Probit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%