1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-521x(98)00040-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of improved land use technologies to increase food security in Burkina Faso: relating animal traction, productivity, and non-farm income

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that the adoption of agricultural innovation and sustainable land practices may influence the level of agricultural productivity which in turn helps determine farm income and household food insecurity [31,32]. Minten and Barrett [33] show that Madagascarian farmers regard productivity-enhancing innovations, such as improved access to agricultural equipment, irrigation, and cattle, as key elements to increase their food security.…”
Section: Food Security Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the adoption of agricultural innovation and sustainable land practices may influence the level of agricultural productivity which in turn helps determine farm income and household food insecurity [31,32]. Minten and Barrett [33] show that Madagascarian farmers regard productivity-enhancing innovations, such as improved access to agricultural equipment, irrigation, and cattle, as key elements to increase their food security.…”
Section: Food Security Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used both socio-economic variables and income from different crop enterprises in the PCA. Since the impact of off-farm income on technology adoption is well-reported, the present study also used off-farm income as a factor for classification (Savadogo et al 1998;Nehring et al 2005;Fernandez-Cornejo et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, outcomes of the actions may change or reinforce the environment, institutions and activities through a certain feedback mechanism. In this context, food security is considered as an outcome, which might depend on certain factors including, not limited to, human capital where a relatively small group of educated people are aware of making technological choices, access to public services (Zeller et al 1998), and perceived security of rights to land (Maxwell and Wiebe 1998), labor endowment, and adoption of technologies that can enhance land productivity (Savadago et al 1998;Falco et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%