2016
DOI: 10.9734/ajaees/2016/17877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of Improved Herbicides Spraying Technology among Farmers in Ayamelum L.G.A of Anambra State, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increase of profit/income via higher yield/harvest due to improved technology had significant positive correlation with age (r=0.230; p<0.01), gender (r=0.214; p<0.05), experience (r= 0.194; p<0.05), and income (r=0.228; p<0.05) ( Table 7). These are in agreement with findings of Langy and Mekura (2005) who reported that older farmers have higher accumulated capital, more contacts with extension workers, better preferred by credit institutions and larger family size, all of which may make them more prepared to adopt technology more than younger ones, but not in agreement with Ume, et al (2009), who suggested that older farmers are less amendable to change and hence reluctant to adopt new technologies. According to Langy and Mekura (2005), experience of farmers is generally relevant to adopt new technology through interaction with their neighbours and the outside world.…”
Section: Pearson Correlation Analysis Of Socio-economic Characteristisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Increase of profit/income via higher yield/harvest due to improved technology had significant positive correlation with age (r=0.230; p<0.01), gender (r=0.214; p<0.05), experience (r= 0.194; p<0.05), and income (r=0.228; p<0.05) ( Table 7). These are in agreement with findings of Langy and Mekura (2005) who reported that older farmers have higher accumulated capital, more contacts with extension workers, better preferred by credit institutions and larger family size, all of which may make them more prepared to adopt technology more than younger ones, but not in agreement with Ume, et al (2009), who suggested that older farmers are less amendable to change and hence reluctant to adopt new technologies. According to Langy and Mekura (2005), experience of farmers is generally relevant to adopt new technology through interaction with their neighbours and the outside world.…”
Section: Pearson Correlation Analysis Of Socio-economic Characteristisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The coefficient of farm size was negative against a prior expectation, implying that the more the increase in farm size used, the less the quantity of cassava output produced. The sign identity of the variable could be attributed to its' paucity as agriculture competes with infrastructural developments over it [8]. The determinants of technical efficiency in cassava were shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, 65% of the respondents of the respondents are member of organization. Members of the organization could gain access to information patterning to climate change and other environmental effects associated with goat production through interaction among members [29]. Additionally, 91.7% of the respondents had formal education, while only 8.3% had no formal education.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could imply that educated people are often more receptive to adoption of environmental free pollution technologies, as they are aware of the consequences of environmental abuse as result of their activities and could leave nothing to avert it. This may perhaps through adhering to safe use and handling, following manufacturers' instructional manuals on the use of the technologies and wearing all the necessary protective material while applying the technologies [29]. Nevertheless, [8] differed significantly with aforesaid assertion but truly observed that people with high educational status has low probability of being a farmer than engaging in 'white collar job', hence may not be interested in agricultureenvironmental issues, provided he or she is not directly affected.…”
Section: Sfp Volumementioning
confidence: 99%