Adoption of autonomous robots in the soft fruit sector: Grower perspectives in the UK

Rose, David Christian; Bhattacharya, Mondira

doi:10.1016/j.atech.2022.100118

Cited by 17 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To date, participatory approaches used in the development of agricultural robotics have predominantly involved consultation on technical challenges in the field and technical problems in agriculture that require solutions (Rose et al, 2021). These approaches lack the principles of substantive inclusion identified above (Rose and Bhattacharya, 2023). Examples of participation and inclusion in the technical dimensions of agricultural robotic development have thus far employed a range of tools, including the use of augmented reality (Huuskonen & Oksanen, 2019), on-farm trials (Adamides et al, 2017) and simulation events (see Riek, 2012 for methods), farmer surveys (Rose and Bhattacharya, 2023;Tamirat et al, 2023;von Veltheim and Heise, 2021;von Veltheim et al, 2022), public surveys (Pfeiffer et al, 2021;Spykman et al, 2022) and farmer interviews (Redhead et al, 2015).…”

Section: Inclusion For Agricultural Robotics To Datementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These approaches lack the principles of substantive inclusion identified above (Rose and Bhattacharya, 2023). Examples of participation and inclusion in the technical dimensions of agricultural robotic development have thus far employed a range of tools, including the use of augmented reality (Huuskonen & Oksanen, 2019), on-farm trials (Adamides et al, 2017) and simulation events (see Riek, 2012 for methods), farmer surveys (Rose and Bhattacharya, 2023;Tamirat et al, 2023;von Veltheim and Heise, 2021;von Veltheim et al, 2022), public surveys (Pfeiffer et al, 2021;Spykman et al, 2022) and farmer interviews (Redhead et al, 2015). A recent study in four European countries by Tamirat et al (2023) went further than including only farmers, and instead interviewed robotic companies, academics, project managers, public authorities, and environmental conservation societies.…”

Section: Inclusion For Agricultural Robotics To Datementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social and ethical considerations for agricultural robotics

Ayris¹,

Rose²

2024

Burleigh Dodds Series in Agricultural Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The scaling of agricultural robotics could help us to achieve sustainable agricultural transitions around the world, solving production, environmental, and socio-political challenges. Yet, for all the promises, there are social and ethical aspects to consider before pursuing pathways towards development and implementation. This chapter uses a responsible innovation framework to anticipate the possible challenges involved in the scaling of agricultural robotics, as well as how to include a wide range of stakeholder views. We discuss which stakeholders should be included in setting trajectories for agri-robotics, as well as how to engage harder to reach voices in a meaningful way. We then turn to how these stakeholder views can be reflexively incorporated into responsive practices, such as standards and codes of practice, to mitigate against some of the potential negative impacts of robotics.

show abstract

Section: Inclusion For Agricultural Robotics To Datementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Inclusion For Agricultural Robotics To Datementioning

confidence: 99%

Social and ethical considerations for agricultural robotics

Ayris¹,

Rose²

2024

Burleigh Dodds Series in Agricultural Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The soft‐fruit (e.g., strawberry) industry, heavily reliant on seasonal labour, struggled to find workers. This led to some farms experimenting with automation and robotics to mitigate the impact (Rose & Bhattacharya, 2023). Germany, Europe's largest economy, experienced a surge in online grocery shopping during COVID times.…”

Section: Covid‐19 and The Food Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surviving the storm: navigating the quadruple whammy impact on Europe's food supply chain

Jagtap,

Trollman,

Trollman

et al. 2024

Int J of Food Sci Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryThis article explores the impact of the ‘Quadruple Whammy’ consisting of Brexit, COVID‐19, Conflicts (Russia‐Ukraine and Israel‐Palestine) and Natural disasters on the food supply chain in Europe. This research adopted a two‐phase methodology comprised of the e‐Delphi technique followed by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) approach within the context of these four identified challenges. The objective of this article is to analyse the challenges faced by the European food supply chain due to these four factors. The article examines the impact of political isolationism such as Brexit on trade, cost and border controls, while also discussing the effects of COVID‐19 on labour, supply chains and the rise of e‐commerce. In addition, the article examines the impact of conflicts on food access and availability and the role of international aid and assistance. The effects of natural disasters, such as the Turkish and Moroccan earthquakes, floods in Spain and Portugal and the Moroccan drought, on food security are also analysed. The article offers several strategies for taming the quadruple whammy, such as investing in local food production and supply chains, diversifying supply chains and trade partnerships and strengthening food safety regulations and standards. The importance of building resilience and preparedness in the face of these challenges is emphasised and the article concludes with final thoughts and recommendations.

show abstract

“…Diverse studies from Mashi et al (2022), Autio et al (2021), Thompson et al (2022), Bambio et al (2022) and Addison et al (2023) navigate through urban farming in Nigeria sustainable farming practices in Europe, and the nuances of technology adoption in West Africa, respectively. As we delve deeper into the nuances of technology in agriculture, Shazwan Azizul et al (2023), Gardezi and Stock (2021), Taheri et al (2020), Ullah et al (2020), Vinco et al (2023), Ullah et al (2023) and Rose and Bhattacharya (2023), respectively study drones in rice cultivation in Malaysia, algorithmic rationality, hand tractors in Pakistan, emission targets in Canada, and the challenges and impacts of autonomous robots in the UK agriculture sector. Concluding the synthesis, Shikuku (2019) draws attention to the profound impact of social distance on information exchange and technology adoption, emphasising the transformative potential of social learning.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review on the factors governing precision agriculture adoption among small-scale farmers

John,

Hussin,

Shahibi

et al. 2023

Outlook Agric

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global agricultural paradigm is witnessing a transformative shift with the advent of precision agriculture. While large-scale agricultural enterprises have been swift in their embrace of this innovation, its uptake among small-scale farmers remains nuanced and complex. This study elucidates the multi-faceted determinants that influence the adoption of precision agriculture within the small-scale farming sector. The study adopts a systematic literature review approach, meticulously selecting and analysing 29 relevant papers. Drawing upon an exhaustive literature review and empirical analyses, the research presents a composite framework weaving economic, technological, social, and environmental factors. Among these, the social dynamics emerge as the most significant factor, shaped by awareness levels, knowledge dissemination pathways, and entrenched cultural norms. These social elements often intertwine with ingrained traditional practices and perceptions, forming the most intricate layer shaping adoption attitudes. Notably, although economic factors like substantial initial investments and the calculus of Return on Investment are present, they are overshadowed by social considerations. The technological landscape is characterised by the challenges of digital literacy, infrastructural readiness, and technological interoperability. Lastly, environmental imperatives, underscored by resource scarcity, climate change resilience, and ecosystem services, offer both challenges and motivations. Together, these factors delineate the intricate roadmap guiding small-scale farmers in their journey toward precision agriculture adoption. This comprehensive exploration provides stakeholders with actionable insights, fostering informed decision-making and strategic interventions to augment precision agriculture's integration within the small-scale farming tapestry.

show abstract

Adoption of autonomous robots in the soft fruit sector: Grower perspectives in the UK

Cited by 17 publications

References 52 publications

Social and ethical considerations for agricultural robotics

Social and ethical considerations for agricultural robotics

Surviving the storm: navigating the quadruple whammy impact on Europe's food supply chain

A systematic review on the factors governing precision agriculture adoption among small-scale farmers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About