Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of a Bayesian Belief Network for the System Safety Assessment of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…can also be included. Graphical models such as BN have been used for applications including system reliability modelling Marquez et al (2010), safety analysis for remotely piloted aircraft Washington et al (2019) and automated ships Hanninen and Kujala (2012), and in the management of risk more generally Fenton and Neil (2007). With the BN modelling technique it is possible to describe any acyclic causal relationships between variables using graphical networks comprising nodes and directed edges between them.…”
Section: Modelling Epistemic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…can also be included. Graphical models such as BN have been used for applications including system reliability modelling Marquez et al (2010), safety analysis for remotely piloted aircraft Washington et al (2019) and automated ships Hanninen and Kujala (2012), and in the management of risk more generally Fenton and Neil (2007). With the BN modelling technique it is possible to describe any acyclic causal relationships between variables using graphical networks comprising nodes and directed edges between them.…”
Section: Modelling Epistemic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recent studies in the field of safety and reliability show a significant increase in the use of BNs for risk assessment, taking advantage of their system modelling capabilities and inference techniques Washington et al (2019). Additionally, PGM models also allow the combination of expert knowledge and available data for likelihood estimation of desired variables during safety analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the failure determination have been compared, from Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), European Union Aviation Safety Authority (EASA) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) regulatory bodies. In the conclusion of the study, by Bayesian Belief Network failure condition severity classification is handled and it is pointed out that risk-based approach supports RPAS to be more systematic and objective particularly for emerging aviation systems [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies investigated safety risk analysis for sUAS operations (Öztekin and Luxhøj 2008;Luxhøj and Öztekin 2009;Luxhøj 2013Luxhøj , 2015Wackwitz and Boedecker 2015;Ancel et al 2017;Barr et al 2017;Belcastro et al 2017;Krishnakumar et al 2017;Washington et al 2017b;Breunig et al 2018;Denney et al 2018;Lundby et al 2019). Wackwitz and Boedecker (2015) outlined and demonstrated best practices for performing a hazard analysis for sUAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancel et al (2017) used a BBN model to make real-time estimations of risk during an sUAS operation. A number of other studies have used BBNs for quantifying risk to sUAS (Öztekin and Luxhøj 2008;Luxhøj and Öztekin 2009;Luxhøj 2015;Washington et al 2017b;Denney et al 2018;Washington et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%