Adopting environmentally-friendly certifications: transaction cost and capabilities perspectives within the Italian wine supply chain

Abstract

Purpose Environmentally-friendly certifications have increased over the past decade within food supply chains. Although a large body of literature has explored the drivers leading firms to adopt such certifications, it has not closely examined the strategic motivations associated with their adoption. This paper aims to investigate an environmentally-friendly certification, VIVA, examining its role as an alternative form of supply chain governance. The aim is to investigate the drivers affecting the adoption of VIVA and to assess managerial perceptions related to transaction-related characteristics and the firm’s internal resources and capabilities. Design/methodology/approach This study draws upon both an extended transaction cost economics perspective, which is based on transaction risks and the resource-based view, which examines a firm’s internal resources. A survey was conducted via a structured questionnaire sent to all of the wine producers in charge of the decision regarding whether to adopt VIVA certification. A Hierarchal Bayesian Model was applied to analyse questionnaire responses. Such a model allows us to specify the probabilistic relationship between questions and latent constructs and to carry over uncertainty across modelling levels. Findings The adoption of this environmentally-friendly certification is envisioned as a tool to curb internal risks, and thus to manage behavioural uncertainty within the supply chain. A high level of exposure to exogenous transaction risks discourages firms from adopting VIVA certification. The certification system is not perceived as a promoter of operational capabilities. Managers are more likely to implement the certification when they expect that its adoption will leverage their potential knowledge of the supply chain or prompt new and better collaborations with the suppliers. Therefore, the certification can become a resource that interacts with the capabilities of the firm, expressing complementarities that stimulate the formation of dynamic capabilities. Research limitations/implications The identification of drivers from the two theoretical perspectives offers insights into the attributes that are perceived as important by managers and which, therefore, could be leveraged to foster the adoption of the environmental certification. The external validity of the study could be improved by extending the sample to other certifications and supply chains. Originality/value The study offers a different perspective on environmental certification. It demonstrates that considering the certification as an alternative form of supply chain governance opens up a set of efficiency and strategic considerations that could be addressed to promote the effectiveness of an environmental strategy within a supply chain

Voluntary standards as meso‐institutions: A Bayesian investigation of their relationships with transaction governance and risks

“…However, our methodology expands upon these econometric approaches by carefully defining the latent quantities elicited through survey data and integrating multiple modeling stages into a single probabilistic construct. Following Stranieri et al (2021), we begin by relating the polytomous survey data to the two unobserved features of interest: internal risk and external risk. Next, the levels of risks enter the conditional mean of a compositional data (Dirichlet) model that links the share of spot market, hybrid, or vertically integrated product sourcing to a vector of covariates, plus the previously defined latent characteristics.…”

Open Innovation Frameworks: A diagnostic analysis of deployment, engagement, evaluation, and governance of Open Innovation in SMEs

“…The difficulty in evaluating the efficiency of some functions performed in compliance with contractual responsibilities is referred to as behavioural uncertainty. Behaviour uncertainty is defined as the lack of knowledge and uncertainty relative to the conduct of external parties participating in the transactions [75]. The challenge of anticipating the intents and behaviours of outside parties that serve as partners in strategic partnerships is known as behavioural uncertainty.…”

“…The challenge of anticipating the intents and behaviours of outside parties that serve as partners in strategic partnerships is known as behavioural uncertainty. Relationships may last longer if appropriate control mechanisms and information exchange are in place [75].…”

Dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Toward a typology based on dimensions of sustainability‐oriented innovation and stakeholder integration

“…This type of DCsS often involves collaboration with suppliers (primarily by exchanging information and best practices) to develop new environmentally friendly products or services and correspondingly adapt supply-chain operations. Beske, 2012;Beske et al, 2014;Bhatia & Jakhar, 2021;Bhatia, 2021;Chkanikova & Sroufe, 2021;Gelhard & von Delft, 2016;Hofmann et al, 2012;Hong et al, 2018;Rauer & Kaufmann, 2015;Sarkis et al, 2010;Scarpellini et al, 2020;Shahzad et al, 2020;Stranieri et al, 2021;Strauss et al, 2017 Type 4 Systemic transformation (n = 35) Systemic transformation refers to a firm's capacity to reliably develop new products, transform business models, and drive internal process innovation by integrating stakeholders' concerns into its decision-making and innovation processes.…”