2022
DOI: 10.1002/jad.12017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents' longitudinal trajectories of mental health and loneliness: The impact of COVID‐19 school closures

Abstract: Introduction: Longitudinal research examining the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) school closures on the mental health of adolescents is scarce. Prolonged periods of physical and social isolation because of such restrictions may have impacted heavily on adolescents' mental health and loneliness. Methods: The current study addresses a major gap by examining the impact of school closures on the mental health and loneliness of 785, 10-to 17-year-old Western Australian adolescents (mean age = 14.1, S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
48
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(119 reference statements)
10
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, the data suggest that a substantial proportion of adolescents frequently felt lonely during the time of national lockdown and that loneliness had intensified during this period for many adolescents. These findings concur with concerns expressed in the scientific literature about the potential negative effect of the pandemic and the resulting measures to curb the spread of the virus on the mental health and well-being of young persons (Loades et al, 2020 ) although not all studies are consistent with the above (Houghton et al, 2022 ; Myhr et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taken together, the data suggest that a substantial proportion of adolescents frequently felt lonely during the time of national lockdown and that loneliness had intensified during this period for many adolescents. These findings concur with concerns expressed in the scientific literature about the potential negative effect of the pandemic and the resulting measures to curb the spread of the virus on the mental health and well-being of young persons (Loades et al, 2020 ) although not all studies are consistent with the above (Houghton et al, 2022 ; Myhr et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the 2020 YouGov survey, 41% of the children and young persons surveyed reported that they were lonelier than they had been before lockdown (Barnardo’s, 2020 ). There is some evidence from other countries on the negative impact of the pandemic disease containment measures on adolescents’ loneliness (Ellis et al, 2020 ) although findings from a prospective study involving Australian youth (Houghton et al, 2022 ) and findings from a Norwegian study using repeated cross-sectional surveys (Myhr et al, 2021 ) have shown no increase in loneliness in relation to school closure and disease containment measures earlier in the pandemic relative to pre-pandemic measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of data collection in this present study must also be addressed. Increasing evidence suggests the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic related school closures, social distancing from peers and teachers, and cancelling of extra-curricular activities had negative effects on adolescents’ mental health and feelings of loneliness worldwide (see Houghton et al, 2022). At the time of data collection in the present research, school closures were being introduced in Western Australia (WA) and this may have impacted the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of studies (Houghton et al, 2014(Houghton et al, , 2016(Houghton et al, , 2020(Houghton et al, , 2022 employing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis have consistently reported four correlated factors: Friendship related loneliness (i.e., having reliable, trustworthy supportive friends); isolation (i.e., having few friends or believing that there was no one around offering support); having a positive attitude to being alone (i.e., positive aspects and benefits of being alone such as relaxing, happiness); and having a negative attitude to being alone (i.e., negative aspects of being alone such as time dragging, unhappiness). Fit statistics for the PALs have included: CFI (.92-.99), NFI (.90-.91) and RMSEA = 0.03-0.06 (90% CI: .054-.061); Cronbach alphas have ranged from: friendship related loneliness (α = .86-.93), isolation (α = .80-.89), positive attitude to being alone (α = .78-.88) and negative attitude to being alone (α = .77-.81) (see Houghton et al, 2014Houghton et al, , 2016Houghton et al, , 2020Houghton et al, , 2022. A recent Rasch analysis of the PALs (Houghton et al, 2020) supported its interval scale measurement properties.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stressful life events, such as the previous outbreaks of influenza A (H1N1) and Ebola, increase the risk of mental health problems by eliciting the public's negative emotional responses (e.g., depression and anxiety; Liao et al, 2014 ; Van Bortel et al, 2016 ). During the early period of COVID‐19, studies across the globe indicate that adolescents experience higher levels of anxiety disorders and depressive symptoms compared to pre‐pandemic levels (Houghton et al, 2022 ; Racine et al, 2020 ; D. Wang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%