2005
DOI: 10.1108/17473610510701223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents’ influence on family decision‐making

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Often these purchases are unknown to parents. Chavda et al (2005) states that the lower the socio-orientation and the greater freedom the child has to develop their own consumption views, the more influence the child exerts on their family purchase decisions. Pilgrim and Lawrence (2001) observe that children are increasingly being allowed to choose what food they eat because they pester their parents into buying what they want.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Often these purchases are unknown to parents. Chavda et al (2005) states that the lower the socio-orientation and the greater freedom the child has to develop their own consumption views, the more influence the child exerts on their family purchase decisions. Pilgrim and Lawrence (2001) observe that children are increasingly being allowed to choose what food they eat because they pester their parents into buying what they want.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Churchill and Moschis (1979) state that there are only three agents in consumer socialisation: television, parents and peers. However, more contemporary work believes that the school also has an influence in child consumer socialisation (Lindstrom and Seybold, 2003;Ludvigsen and Sharma, 2004;Chavda et al, 2005;Lewis, 2005). The agents which socialise children, influence children in different ways depending on their frequency of contact, primacy and control over rewards and punishments given to the individual (Moschis and Moore, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, advanced or more prestigious innovative products draw interest and admiration from consumers, thus leading to the phenomenon of vicarious innovativeness, which means that people adopt the idea of the novel product, but not necessarily the product per se (Im, Mason & Houston, 2007 Adolescents are perceived to be trendsetters for their parents (Ekstrom, 2007;Gavish, Shoham & Ruvio, 2010); also, they transmit information gained via the internet to parents and shape their family purchases (Kaur & Medury, 2011). Not surprisingly, parents report that their perception of children's infl uence on the purchase of technology products is higher than that of their children (Chavda, Haley & Dunn, 2005). Bearing in mind the complexity of technological products, the advantage of adolescents' knowledge about them and general interest they have in innovative products, irrespective of product category, we expect that:…”
Section: Purchase Decisions On Traditional and Innovative Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these studies can uncover general patterns of interpersonal influence, they do not consider situational effects, which are thought to be a key influence on whether, when and how influence occurs (Brown et al 2008). For example, the category of product being purchased was found to affect the susceptibility to social influence (Chavda, Haley and Dunn, 2005).…”
Section: Interpersonal Influence In Consumption Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%