2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents and Adults Undergoing Temperature-Controlled Surgical Instruments vs Electrocautery in Tonsillectomy

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Several temperature-controlled surgical instruments (TCSIs) have been used in tonsillectomy. However, to our knowledge, a meta-analysis of the differences between modern TCSIs and electrocautery (EC) has not been conducted. OBJECTIVE To compare TCSIs with EC with regard to the intraoperative and postoperative parameters of tonsillectomy.DATA SOURCES PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched independently by 2 authors for relevant articles.STUDY SELECTION A literature search id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential explanation could be that adults tend to have more scar tissues, due to previous infections, and consequently, they require more "invasive" surgical techniques with "hot" cauterization [13]. Previous studies found that postoperative pain was reduced when temperature-controlled instruments were used [6]. An internal report conducted at Medtronic stated that the device generated less external heat compared to a monopolar electrosurgical device (79.6 ± 2.4 °C versus 123.9 ± 10.0 °C) [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A potential explanation could be that adults tend to have more scar tissues, due to previous infections, and consequently, they require more "invasive" surgical techniques with "hot" cauterization [13]. Previous studies found that postoperative pain was reduced when temperature-controlled instruments were used [6]. An internal report conducted at Medtronic stated that the device generated less external heat compared to a monopolar electrosurgical device (79.6 ± 2.4 °C versus 123.9 ± 10.0 °C) [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the risk of secondary haemorrhage is well documented [4]. Temperature-controlled surgical instruments may cause less postoperative pain than conventional instruments, but reports on postoperative bleeding are inconsistent [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta‐analysis 4 of pediatric studies considering pain after Coblation tonsillectomy vs DT identified only two studies with adequate pain data both of which are extracapsular rather than intracapsular coblation procedures. A meta‐analysis of adult tonsillectomy studies 5 compared multiple different cold techniques (including coblation) with hot techniques (cautery) unsurprisingly found more pain with hot techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, postoperative pain and other complications are reported to occur as a result of the high temperatures used (400-600 • C) and thus lower temperature tools have been developed, such as the Harmonic Scalpel and the PlasmaBlade. These work at lower temperatures than common electrocautery operating temperatures but still enable coagulation from temperaturs of 60 • C as they can operate at temperature ranges between 40-70 • C and 40-100 • C, respectively [7].…”
Section: Electrocautery Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%