2016
DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2016.1171740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent Summer Camp Volunteers' Attitudes Toward Peers with Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the significantly increased scores in the affect subset of the MAS and self-efficacy of the experimental group indicate the effectiveness of direct contact and the hands-on experiences working with individuals with disabilities on the emotional attitudes of kinesiology students. Our findings are in line with previous studies suggesting that personal interactions and direct contacts are significant to change of attitude toward individuals with disabilities (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000;Vilchinsky et al, 2010) and self-efficacy (Mann & Deangelo, 2016).One's emotional reaction toward individuals with disabilities is considered innate and spontaneous and would be modified by additional contact (Vilchinsky et al, 2010). Contact with individuals with disabilities itself can somewhat remove feeling of rejection toward people with disabilities; however, overcoming anxiety and uneasy feeling, and seeing individuals with disabilities' ability to function in the context requires longer interaction with the person with disability (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the significantly increased scores in the affect subset of the MAS and self-efficacy of the experimental group indicate the effectiveness of direct contact and the hands-on experiences working with individuals with disabilities on the emotional attitudes of kinesiology students. Our findings are in line with previous studies suggesting that personal interactions and direct contacts are significant to change of attitude toward individuals with disabilities (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000;Vilchinsky et al, 2010) and self-efficacy (Mann & Deangelo, 2016).One's emotional reaction toward individuals with disabilities is considered innate and spontaneous and would be modified by additional contact (Vilchinsky et al, 2010). Contact with individuals with disabilities itself can somewhat remove feeling of rejection toward people with disabilities; however, overcoming anxiety and uneasy feeling, and seeing individuals with disabilities' ability to function in the context requires longer interaction with the person with disability (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…One’s emotional reaction toward individuals with disabilities is considered innate and spontaneous and would be modified by additional contact (Vilchinsky et al, 2010). Contact with individuals with disabilities itself can somewhat remove feeling of rejection toward people with disabilities; however, overcoming anxiety and uneasy feeling, and seeing individuals with disabilities’ ability to function in the context requires longer interaction with the person with disability (Fort et al, 2017; Rimmerman et al, 2000). Studies reported that certain academic majors related to knowledge of and practice with individuals with disabilities (e.g., rehabilitation, social work) tended to have more favorable attitudes than other majors (Chan et al, 2002; Schwartz & Armony-Sivan, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies mention that volunteers feel confused, afraid and even disgusted by these people, as they fail to understand that people with disabilities behave differently, and look different from what is socially accepted; on the other hand, such social differences between the various individuals can prompt volunteers to feel that they should protect intellectually disabled people, since social norms dictate so (Fort et al, 2017 ; Khoo & Engelhorn, 2011 ). The sharing of experiences between them can produce behaviour changes and greater acceptance of these people (Fort et al, 2017 ), although some volunteers report that contacting with intellectually disabled people is not always enjoyable, and in some cases the experiences can be difficult, as the volunteer feels unable to cope with the problems associated with mental illness and feels that it is necessary to have a professional in the field of psychology to make this contact (Southby et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently several studies on volunteering in the most diverse areas. However, the literature mentions that volunteering in the specific area of disability is scarce (Fort et al, 2017 ; Gaymard & Chauvet, 2016 ; McConkey et al, 2021 ; Smith et al, 2018 ), and NPOs acting in this field face difficulties in recruiting resources due to the negative public opinion associated with people with mental illnesses (Gaymard & Chauvet, 2016 ). Most contacts with intellectually disabled people are informal and happen through neighbours, friends or family members (Han et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kilkenny et al (19) found that participants of the National Stroke Foundation Ambassadors Programme signi cantly improved knowledge of risk factors and signs of a stroke, after training and providing public education. Fort et al (20) revealed that adolescent volunteers had signi cantly improved their attitudes towards disability after services. They thought that the services allowed them to develop relationships with peers who have disabilities, framing their understanding of their di culties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%