2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent injury prevention programs associated with sports-related injury reduction

Abstract: EDITOR'S NOTE: Studies for this issue were identified using the Clinical Queries feature of PubMed, "hand" searching JAMA Pediatrics, Pediatrics, and The Journal of Pediatrics, and from customized EvidenceUpdates alerts.EBM PEARL: PUBLICATION BIAS: Publication bias, one of the systematic review/meta-analysis-study methodologic validity issues, typically occurs when there is a nonrandom surplus of studies detecting, versus not detecting, statistical significance. Among reasons why "negative" studies may not be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, younger players can also be exposed to a high risk of sustaining injuries while playing soccer ( Rössler et al, 2016 ), which suggests the importance of implementing injury prevention programs for players aged below 14 years old. Recently, the FIFA 11+ Kids program has been developed and applied in more than 4000 players aged between 7 and 12 years old, leading to a 50% reduction in the number of injuries in relation to control groups ( Rössler and Faude, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, younger players can also be exposed to a high risk of sustaining injuries while playing soccer ( Rössler et al, 2016 ), which suggests the importance of implementing injury prevention programs for players aged below 14 years old. Recently, the FIFA 11+ Kids program has been developed and applied in more than 4000 players aged between 7 and 12 years old, leading to a 50% reduction in the number of injuries in relation to control groups ( Rössler and Faude, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%