2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3171768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADMM-Based Method for Estimating Magnetotelluric Impedance in the Time Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing time series processing techniques, such as the least-square method (Sims et al, 1971), remote reference method (Goubau et al, 1978;Gamble et al, 1979b;Gamble et al, 1979a), robust estimation method (Egbert and Booker, 1986;Chave et al, 1987;Larsen et al, 1996;Smirnov, 2003;Chave and Thomson, 2004), maximum likelihood estimation method (Chave, 2014;Chave, 2017), and others methods based on wavelet transform, 10.3389/feart.2023.1086749 Hilbert-Huang transform, variational mode decomposition, and interstation transfer function (Kappler, 2012;Cai, 2014;Campanya et al, 2014;Cai and Chen, 2015;Carbonari et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2017), have different processing performance for different kinds of noise. For example, the least-square method performs poorly in the presence of outliers (Egbert and Booker, 1986), and the remote reference method does not work when noise is correlated at the local and remote sites (Shalivahan and Bhattacharya, 2002;Pomposiello et al, 2009), and the robust estimation method usually fails to work when MT data are contaminated by persistent or coherent noises (Escalas et al, 2013;Carbonari et al, 2017;Li et al, 2020a;Li et al, 2020c;Zhou et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). New time series processing methods for various types of noise are the focus of current research, but there is a lack of criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of various MT time series processing methods in existing studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing time series processing techniques, such as the least-square method (Sims et al, 1971), remote reference method (Goubau et al, 1978;Gamble et al, 1979b;Gamble et al, 1979a), robust estimation method (Egbert and Booker, 1986;Chave et al, 1987;Larsen et al, 1996;Smirnov, 2003;Chave and Thomson, 2004), maximum likelihood estimation method (Chave, 2014;Chave, 2017), and others methods based on wavelet transform, 10.3389/feart.2023.1086749 Hilbert-Huang transform, variational mode decomposition, and interstation transfer function (Kappler, 2012;Cai, 2014;Campanya et al, 2014;Cai and Chen, 2015;Carbonari et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2017), have different processing performance for different kinds of noise. For example, the least-square method performs poorly in the presence of outliers (Egbert and Booker, 1986), and the remote reference method does not work when noise is correlated at the local and remote sites (Shalivahan and Bhattacharya, 2002;Pomposiello et al, 2009), and the robust estimation method usually fails to work when MT data are contaminated by persistent or coherent noises (Escalas et al, 2013;Carbonari et al, 2017;Li et al, 2020a;Li et al, 2020c;Zhou et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). New time series processing methods for various types of noise are the focus of current research, but there is a lack of criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of various MT time series processing methods in existing studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional evaluation method based on curve continuity is proved to be unreliable (Sutarno, 2005). Many studies take the measured low-noise data as the standard data, but because the real response is unknown, it is insufficient to prove the effectiveness of the time series processing method (Li et al, 2020a;Li et al, 2020b;Guo et al, 2022;Zhou et al, 2022). Therefore, reliable standard time series are urgently needed to test the effectiveness of various time series processing methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%