“…As Figure 1(a) shows, for unimanual lift, the human grasps the object at its center using a power grip of one hand and lifts it with the PARS. However, for bimanual lift, the mechanical design is modified through attaching two lightweight handles to the PAO, and the human grasps the handles using power grips of two hands and lifts the PAO with the PARS, as in Figure 1(b) and (c) (it is different from when the object has only one handle, and the human grasps the handle using one hand and lifts it 8 ). The bimanual lift has two arrangement of force sensors: (i) the human lifts the PAO grasping at two handles, but the PAO is tied to the screw nut through only one force sensor (load cell) at its bottom (we call it ''common force sensor case'' as in Figure 1(b)) and (ii) the PAO is attached to the screw nut directly without any force sensor, the human lifts the PAO grasping at two handles and two separate force sensors (foil strain gauges) are attached to the handles (we call it ''separate force sensors case'' as in Figure 1(c)).…”
“…Most physical human-robot interactions (pHRIs) follow impedance controls, 8 but we derive controls for the PARS differently based on equation (4) as in Figure 2 that may fall within the admittance control (force is input and displacement is output), 8 integrated with velocity control 10 and position feedback. 18 The commanded velocity ( _ x c ) and the position feedback are expressed in equation (5), where _ x c is the input to the servomotor, G is the feedback gain, and the servomotor produces the actuating force according to _ x c .…”
“…A few systems attempted to resolve this problem through gravity compensation. 4,8,15 However, zero gravity removes haptic feelings partly that is not good for haptic manipulation of objects between human and robot. 19 Again, for gravity compensation, the systems need to know the value of object mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 For handling heavy objects, large inertia, friction, and dynamic effects are expected, which may be compensated and positional accuracy may be provided by admittance controls. 8 Admittance parameters (virtual mass, damping, and stiffness) may affect HRI and manipulation performance. For example, for large admittance parameters, large human force may be required to move the object, human may feel more heaviness (more potential fatigue), movement may be slow (low acceleration), but precise (fine, smooth) manipulation may be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Dimeas et al proposed admittance neurocontrol of a PARS for lifting objects. 8 Hara and Sankai developed the ''hybrid assistive limb'' to assist human carry objects. 9 In the studies by Gosselin et al 10 and Lecours et al, 11 an assistive robot was proposed for handling large payloads and the safety was provided through the mechanism.…”
Weight-perception-based fixed admittance control algorithm and variable admittance control algorithm are proposed for unimanual and bimanual lifting of objects with a power assist robotic system. To include weight perception in controls, the mass parameter for the inertial force is hypothesized as different from that for the gravitational force in the dynamics model for lifting objects with the system. For the bimanual lift, two alternative approaches of force sensor arrangements are considered: a common force sensor and two separate force sensors between object and human hands. Computational models for power assistance, excess in load forces, and manipulation efficiency and precision are derived. The fixed admittance control algorithm is evaluated in a 1-degree-of-freedom power assist robotic system. Results show that inclusion of weight perception in controls produce satisfactory performance in terms of power assistance, system kinematics and kinetics, human-robot interactions, and manipulation efficiency and precision. The fixed admittance control algorithm is then augmented to variable admittance control algorithm as a tool of active compliance to vary the admittance with inertia instead of with gravity. The evaluation shows further improvement in the performance for the variable admittance control algorithm. The evaluation also shows that bimanual lifts outperform unimanual lifts and bimanual lifts with separate force sensors outperform bimanual lifts with a common force sensor. Then, the results are proposed to develop power assist robotic systems for handling heavy objects in industries.
“…As Figure 1(a) shows, for unimanual lift, the human grasps the object at its center using a power grip of one hand and lifts it with the PARS. However, for bimanual lift, the mechanical design is modified through attaching two lightweight handles to the PAO, and the human grasps the handles using power grips of two hands and lifts the PAO with the PARS, as in Figure 1(b) and (c) (it is different from when the object has only one handle, and the human grasps the handle using one hand and lifts it 8 ). The bimanual lift has two arrangement of force sensors: (i) the human lifts the PAO grasping at two handles, but the PAO is tied to the screw nut through only one force sensor (load cell) at its bottom (we call it ''common force sensor case'' as in Figure 1(b)) and (ii) the PAO is attached to the screw nut directly without any force sensor, the human lifts the PAO grasping at two handles and two separate force sensors (foil strain gauges) are attached to the handles (we call it ''separate force sensors case'' as in Figure 1(c)).…”
“…Most physical human-robot interactions (pHRIs) follow impedance controls, 8 but we derive controls for the PARS differently based on equation (4) as in Figure 2 that may fall within the admittance control (force is input and displacement is output), 8 integrated with velocity control 10 and position feedback. 18 The commanded velocity ( _ x c ) and the position feedback are expressed in equation (5), where _ x c is the input to the servomotor, G is the feedback gain, and the servomotor produces the actuating force according to _ x c .…”
“…A few systems attempted to resolve this problem through gravity compensation. 4,8,15 However, zero gravity removes haptic feelings partly that is not good for haptic manipulation of objects between human and robot. 19 Again, for gravity compensation, the systems need to know the value of object mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 For handling heavy objects, large inertia, friction, and dynamic effects are expected, which may be compensated and positional accuracy may be provided by admittance controls. 8 Admittance parameters (virtual mass, damping, and stiffness) may affect HRI and manipulation performance. For example, for large admittance parameters, large human force may be required to move the object, human may feel more heaviness (more potential fatigue), movement may be slow (low acceleration), but precise (fine, smooth) manipulation may be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Dimeas et al proposed admittance neurocontrol of a PARS for lifting objects. 8 Hara and Sankai developed the ''hybrid assistive limb'' to assist human carry objects. 9 In the studies by Gosselin et al 10 and Lecours et al, 11 an assistive robot was proposed for handling large payloads and the safety was provided through the mechanism.…”
Weight-perception-based fixed admittance control algorithm and variable admittance control algorithm are proposed for unimanual and bimanual lifting of objects with a power assist robotic system. To include weight perception in controls, the mass parameter for the inertial force is hypothesized as different from that for the gravitational force in the dynamics model for lifting objects with the system. For the bimanual lift, two alternative approaches of force sensor arrangements are considered: a common force sensor and two separate force sensors between object and human hands. Computational models for power assistance, excess in load forces, and manipulation efficiency and precision are derived. The fixed admittance control algorithm is evaluated in a 1-degree-of-freedom power assist robotic system. Results show that inclusion of weight perception in controls produce satisfactory performance in terms of power assistance, system kinematics and kinetics, human-robot interactions, and manipulation efficiency and precision. The fixed admittance control algorithm is then augmented to variable admittance control algorithm as a tool of active compliance to vary the admittance with inertia instead of with gravity. The evaluation shows further improvement in the performance for the variable admittance control algorithm. The evaluation also shows that bimanual lifts outperform unimanual lifts and bimanual lifts with separate force sensors outperform bimanual lifts with a common force sensor. Then, the results are proposed to develop power assist robotic systems for handling heavy objects in industries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.