1985
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1029003188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admissible limits of $M$-subharmonic functions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that it has been observed in [3] that the invariant Green's function G is //-integrable with respect to the invariant measure dx(z) := (1 -\z\2)~n~x dv(z) on B for 1 < p < n/(n -1). This is a special case of the last theorem with a --n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We remark that it has been observed in [3] that the invariant Green's function G is //-integrable with respect to the invariant measure dx(z) := (1 -\z\2)~n~x dv(z) on B for 1 < p < n/(n -1). This is a special case of the last theorem with a --n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The case of admissible limits, f--n and --1, was considered by J. Cima and C. S. Stanton in [2]. The purpose of this paper is to sharpen the above result by obtaining estimates on the exceptional set in terms of the 'non-isotropic' Hausdorff capacity on S.…”
Section: Theorem If F Is a Non-negative Measurable Function On B Satmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In [2], J. Cima and C. S. Stanton showed that the potential of any measure # satisfying (1.1) has admissible limit zero in L q a.e. on S for any q < n/(n-1).…”
Section: E Convergence Of Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slight modification of Example 1 of [2] shows that p > 1 is best possible for admissible limits, and consequently also for tangential limits.…”
Section: Sharpness Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Cima and C . S. Stanton [2] and by M. Stoll [5, 61. In Section 2 we introduce the required notation and definitions and give the statement of the main theorems. In Section 3 we prove several lemmas that will be required for the proof of the main theorems which are given in Section 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%