1993
DOI: 10.1017/s0960129500000165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admissible and derivable rules in intuitionistic logic

Abstract: This paper gives some sufficient conditions for admissible rules to be derivable in intuitionistic propositional calculus. For example, if the premises are Harrop formulas, the rule is admissible only if it is derivable.In deriving the results, a particular class of substitutes is introduced, which are also useful when dealing with other questions of admissibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conjecture was later proved by Iemhoff in the fundamental [6]. Rozière in his Ph.D. thesis [9] reached the same conclusion with a substantially different technique, independently of Visser and Iemhoff. These works elegantly settled the problem of identifying and building admissible rules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This conjecture was later proved by Iemhoff in the fundamental [6]. Rozière in his Ph.D. thesis [9] reached the same conclusion with a substantially different technique, independently of Visser and Iemhoff. These works elegantly settled the problem of identifying and building admissible rules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The positive answer to Friedman's problem was given by V. V. Rybakov [44] (see also [43]). The fact that the rules corresponding to formulas ( * ) constitute the basis of admissible in IPC rules was proved in [18], where these rules are called Visser's rules (since they were reintroduced by A. Visser [47]).…”
Section: The Following Axiomsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this section we briefly explain these proofs in general, the next three sections provide the technical details. The proofs make use of a connection between valuations and substitutions that goes back to Prucnal [29,31] and are crucial in the work of Ghilardi [10] and Rozière [32,33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%