Administrative risks challenging the adoption of smart contracts in construction projects

Abstract

PurposeAs a remedy to usually voluminous, complicated and not easily readable construction contracts, smart contracts can be considered as an effective and alternative solution. However, the construction industry is merely known as a frontrunner for fast adoption of recent technological advancements. Numerous administrative risks challenge construction companies to implement smart contracts. To highlight this issue, this study aims to assess the administrative risks of smart contract adoption in construction projects.Design/methodology/approachA literature survey is conducted to specify administrative risks of smart contracts followed by a pilot study to ensure that the framework is suitable to the research question. The criteria weights are calculated through the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method, followed by a sensitivity analysis based on degree of fuzziness, which supports the robustness of the developed hierarchy and stability of the results. Then, a focus group discussion (FGD) is performed to discuss the mitigation strategies for the top-level risks in each risk category.FindingsThe final framework consists of 27 sub-criteria, which are categorized under five main criteria, namely, contractual, cultural, managerial, planning and relational. The findings show that (1) regulation change, (2) lack of a driving force, (3) works not accounted in planning, (4) shortcomings of current legal arrangements and (5) lack of dispute resolution mechanism are the top five risks challenging the adoption of smart contracts in construction projects. Risk mitigation strategies based on FGD show that improvements for the semi-automated smart contract drafting are considered more practicable compared to full automation.Originality/valueThe literature is limited in terms of the adoption of smart contracts, while the topic is receiving more attention recently. To support easy prevalence of smart contracts, this study attempts the most challenging aspects of smart contract adoption.

Blockchain technology in construction organizations: risk assessment using trapezoidal fuzzy ordinal priority approach

“…Nevertheless, the authors listed technical risks, such as vulnerability, criminal activity and exposure of identities, that can put the construction industry under threat, but the authors did not provide us with an evaluation of identified risks. The findings of Gurgun and Koc (2021) show that smart contract posed significant risks to construction projects and project-based organizations in terms of (1) regulation change in planning, (2) lack of a driving force in management, (3) activities are not accounted in planning, (4) deficiencies in legal arrangements and (5) weak dispute resolution mechanism. Li et al (2019) mentioned some blockchain risks overshadowing construction without any evaluation and discussion, such as malicious attacks, the threat of tampering and manipulating devices, and job security due to automation.…”

“…For this, the authors used the SWOT framework to analyze strengths-weaknesses-opportunitiesthreats caused by blockchain. Gurgun and Koc (2021) targeted administrative risks of smart contracts in construction projects. The authors employed fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine weights of managerial, planning, contractual, relational and cultural criteria.…”

Strategies for implementation of green roofs in developing countries

“…This study adopted the triangular fuzzy numbers (TFN) in the FAHP application since its implementation was first ensured by the Chang (1996). In addition, the triangular fuzzy AHP has widely been for a variety of objectives in the construction management literature such as risk assessment of smart contract (Gurgun and Koc, 2021), building supplier selection (Plebankiewicz and Kubek, 2016), assessment of quality management systems (Lam et al, 2008) and risk assessment of tunnel project (Lyu et al, 2020).…”

Decision-making factors in the adoption of smart contracts in Brazilian companies

“…The results suggest that four factors have a significant influence on the adoption of smart contracts: supply chain pressure, competitive pressure, support from upper management, and the possibility to monitor it. 2 (Gurgun & Koc, 2021). This study seeks to evaluate the administrative risks of adopting smart contracts in construction projects.…”