Administrative paradoxes and paroxysms of resource provision and development of the economy

Abstract

The article presents the author’s opinion on the ambiguity, instability and paradox of the management of resources, resource provision and resource potential. The importance of studying and understanding paradoxical phenomena is emphasized, the urgency of the entropy of civilizational changes, the problems of non-linear, turbulent development of the country, including from the standpoint of the use of resource potential and resource management, is highlighted. Economic paradoxes include the Paradoxes of Easterlin, Giffen, Bazermann, Veblen, Thaler, Coase, Retlisberger. In the system of paradoxes, a special place is occupied by the paradoxes of abundance, innovative development, technological deflation, innovative management of resources and potentials. The sharp politicization of international economic relations is manifested in the paradoxical consequences of globalization, informatization and the redistribution of the world in a period of turbulence and uncertainty. Paradoxes and paroxysms are an integral part of resource management and economics. Paradoxes are connected with the controversy surrounding the effect of the Dutch disease, the “paradox of abundance” or the “curse of resources”, according to which countries with significant natural resources are poorly developed in comparison with countries with small reserves of raw materials or their complete lack. The heightened perception of the problem actualizes the search for a mechanism to effectively manage the natural resource rent and ensure high results for the economic and social development of the country. At the level of management of national resources, a paradoxical situation persists when there is no disposal when owning resources, there is no proportional and fair distribution when selling and receiving surplus income, when the country’s resource wealth is not equated with the wealth and decent life of the people. All the problems of resource management are inextricably linked with the peculiarities of external collisions of world interaction, internal power structuring, cognitive and systematic thinking, ideals and ideologies of development, personalized, individualized transformations of the world. At different levels of systems thinking, technologies and management strategies emerge, change and develop, demanding scientific reinforcement in the ideological, ideological, and methodological direction.