2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00825.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Administrative Failure and the International NGO Response to Hurricane Katrina

Abstract: Balkans Disaster response, child development, maternal and child health, AIDS, agriculture, microfi nance, refugee care, immigration service, and traffi cking victim protection * These organizations responded to earlier disasters in a minimal or informal fashion, but each identifi ed Katrina as their fi rst offi cial and full-fl edged response to a disaster in the United States.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, with the introduction of various national strategies (e.g., National Disaster Recovery Framework, National Health Security Strategy, National Security Strategy) as well as international frameworks [e.g., Sendai Framework, Hyogo Framework for Action (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2005Reduction, , 2015], these approaches have evolved to use risk analysis to identify, assess, and address a range of social, behavioral, and ecological factors that not only contribute to vulnerability but can be leveraged to mitigate or adapt to those stresses (O'Sullivan, Kuziemsky, Toal-Sullivan, & Corneil, 2013;Paton, Parkes, Daly, & Smith, 2008). These fields of emergency management and disaster risk reduction also began to embrace a fuller appreciation of the range of actors involved in response and recovery, namely civil society organizations working alongside government stakeholders (Eikenberry, Arroyave, & Cooper, 2007;Patterson, Weil, & Patel, 2010). More recently, this approach to leverage community strengths for resilience is being applied to the resettlement of whole communities in an effort to adapt to climate change.…”
Section: Definitions and Drivers Of Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, with the introduction of various national strategies (e.g., National Disaster Recovery Framework, National Health Security Strategy, National Security Strategy) as well as international frameworks [e.g., Sendai Framework, Hyogo Framework for Action (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2005Reduction, , 2015], these approaches have evolved to use risk analysis to identify, assess, and address a range of social, behavioral, and ecological factors that not only contribute to vulnerability but can be leveraged to mitigate or adapt to those stresses (O'Sullivan, Kuziemsky, Toal-Sullivan, & Corneil, 2013;Paton, Parkes, Daly, & Smith, 2008). These fields of emergency management and disaster risk reduction also began to embrace a fuller appreciation of the range of actors involved in response and recovery, namely civil society organizations working alongside government stakeholders (Eikenberry, Arroyave, & Cooper, 2007;Patterson, Weil, & Patel, 2010). More recently, this approach to leverage community strengths for resilience is being applied to the resettlement of whole communities in an effort to adapt to climate change.…”
Section: Definitions and Drivers Of Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…American Red Cross led the efforts to organize more than 52 agencies from public and nonprofi t sector to meet the needs of the displaced residents in New Orleans (Eikenberry et al 2007 ). Also, there are coordinating organizations, such as the National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (NVOAD), direction efforts of various VOADs in disaster response and recovery (Gazley 2013 ; ).…”
Section: Network As Governance Tools In Managing Disasters and Crisesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The desire for control by the government over the response and recovery led to the exclusion of local organizations and movements [61,81,17,12,44] None.…”
Section: Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of providing additional resources and personnel to enhance an on-going relief effort; many non-governmental organizations found themselves either on their own or turned away [12,17] and "failures at all levels of government … significantly undermined and detracted from the heroic efforts of first responders, private individuals and organizations, faith-based groups, and others" [61]. Furthermore, the government's failure to plan for and coordinate the efforts of non-profits made it more difficult for them to respond to Hurricane Katrina in the first place [17]. This lack of inclusion of niche innovations in the disaster response injured their ability to gain momentum [M5].…”
Section: Innovation Is Part Of the Everyday Norms And Practices [V5]mentioning
confidence: 99%