1978
DOI: 10.1378/chest.74.2.237b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Administration of Oxygen with Mouth-Held Nasal Prongs during

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods of supplemental oxygen delivery during FB include nasal cannula, Venturi mask, continuous positive airway pressure mask, and pharyngeal catheter. Harless et al 13 reported the efficacy of nasal prongs placed in the mouth of 16 patients undergoing transnasal FB. All of these patients received oxygen at a rate of 7 L/min, since this study was conducted in Salt Lake City at an altitude of 1,520 m and no patients had the prongs placed in the nares.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Methods of supplemental oxygen delivery during FB include nasal cannula, Venturi mask, continuous positive airway pressure mask, and pharyngeal catheter. Harless et al 13 reported the efficacy of nasal prongs placed in the mouth of 16 patients undergoing transnasal FB. All of these patients received oxygen at a rate of 7 L/min, since this study was conducted in Salt Lake City at an altitude of 1,520 m and no patients had the prongs placed in the nares.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these patients received oxygen at a rate of 7 L/min, since this study was conducted in Salt Lake City at an altitude of 1,520 m and no patients had the prongs placed in the nares. 13 In a study that included 160 patients, Milman et al 9 clearly demonstrated that supplemental oxygen, provided either by a nasal catheter or a pharyngeal catheter, significantly reduced hypoxemia during FB compared to patients who did not receive supplemental oxygen. Although patients receiving 2 L/min of supplemental oxygen by pharyngeal catheter had fewer episodes of hypoxemia than those who used a nasal catheter, no patients in the pharyngeal catheter group had a BAL performed during their FB compared to 38% of the patients in the nasal catheter group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A decline in arterial oxygen saturation was frequently noted during FB in infants and children; the risk of desaturation is increased when the bronchoscope was positioned in the mid-trachea. Harless and colleagues 13 reported the efficacy of nasal prongs placed in the mouth of 16 patients undergoing transnasal FB. Weber and others 14 conclude that nasal prongs are as effective as an nasopharyngeal catheter in delivering oxygen to children with a hypoxemia, and they are also safer to use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%