Contrast Media in Practice 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59957-6_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Administration of Contrast Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For DE-MSCT imaging, we used the radiation dose that is used for MSCT coronary angiography (15/21 mSv for men/women). We administered 1 gI/kg iodine contrast to the pigs, equivalent to approximately 200 ml iodine contrast to a patient of 70 kg, which is considered a normal dose of contrast during a conventional angiography procedure (25). Technical developments are desirable that reduce radiation exposure and limit the amount of iodinated contrast material needed.…”
Section: De-msctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For DE-MSCT imaging, we used the radiation dose that is used for MSCT coronary angiography (15/21 mSv for men/women). We administered 1 gI/kg iodine contrast to the pigs, equivalent to approximately 200 ml iodine contrast to a patient of 70 kg, which is considered a normal dose of contrast during a conventional angiography procedure (25). Technical developments are desirable that reduce radiation exposure and limit the amount of iodinated contrast material needed.…”
Section: De-msctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another critical aspect is that only about three relevant papers on this topic have been published in the last 20 years. On the one hand, this is because the contrast media most commonly used to date (e.g., Telebrix 1972), including the MRI contrast media (e.g., Dotarem 1989) were developed over several decades towards the end of the last century and the corresponding studies on patient safety had to be published between invention and approval [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. On the other hand, the importance of image-guided interventions increased with an evident time lag [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%