2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADMET rules of thumb II: A comparison of the effects of common substituents on a range of ADMET parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies have been published recently that are dedicated to the analysis of the influence of physicochemical properties and most popular substituents of organic compounds on ADME and toxicity parameters, including CYP3A4 inhibition [42,45]. The predictions of the baseline model obtained for virtual compounds in Table 5 are within a good agreement with results of these studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Two studies have been published recently that are dedicated to the analysis of the influence of physicochemical properties and most popular substituents of organic compounds on ADME and toxicity parameters, including CYP3A4 inhibition [42,45]. The predictions of the baseline model obtained for virtual compounds in Table 5 are within a good agreement with results of these studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…More recent studies [7][8][9] have shown, however, that compounds close to the Lipinski limits actually have a lower probability of success in development with significantly lower mw and LogP values favored in successful medicines. These observations have led to several revised guidelines suggesting, for example, that molecules with LogP < 3 and polar surface area [10] > 75 2 will show greater safety in pre-clinical studies [9] or that molecules with mw < 400 and LogP < 4 appear to be more successful in a range of assays of drug-like character.…”
Section: Properties Of Successful Hits and Drugsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Along these lines, matched molecular pairs have been analysed for the effect against various antitargets, such as CYPs or hERG. [18,21] Generally, a stronger effect was observed for those substituents which have a large influence on lipophilicity (logD). [21] Both for progressive and conservative substituent changes, a significant number of matched molecular pairs without significant effects on the antitarget response has been observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[21] Both for progressive and conservative substituent changes, a significant number of matched molecular pairs without significant effects on the antitarget response has been observed. [18,21] These results indicate, that the exact position of the modification imposes a significant influence on the biological effect on top of a general trend set by physicochemical property modulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%