2018
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1415684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvanted influenza vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
194
0
21

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
2
194
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The low protective efficacy of influenza vaccines in the aged population (40)(41)(42)(43) is driving an intensive search for adjuvants that will elicit a more effective immune response (17,(44)(45)(46). Purified subunit vaccines such as used in this study are known for their good safety profile and low reactogenicity but also for relatively lower immunogenicity, especially in the aged, compared with whole inactivated virus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low protective efficacy of influenza vaccines in the aged population (40)(41)(42)(43) is driving an intensive search for adjuvants that will elicit a more effective immune response (17,(44)(45)(46). Purified subunit vaccines such as used in this study are known for their good safety profile and low reactogenicity but also for relatively lower immunogenicity, especially in the aged, compared with whole inactivated virus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, multiple rounds of inoculation to elicit protective immune responses against a pathogen is a disadvantage. Moreover, because of the relatively short duration of immunity, many studies are underway to improve this feature [27][28][29]. A potential solution is the addition of immunological adjuvant to protein-based and/or inactivated vaccines [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alum is a potent inducer of the Th2 (IgG1) immune response [23,42]. Similarly, MF59 generally induces a slightly-biased Th2 response as seen for vaccines for influenza virus and MERS-CoV [29,43]. In contrast, MPL induces expression of IFN-γ and IL-2 and, therefore, has a more Th1 bias and generates a more balanced (Th1/Th2) immune response [22,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%